$a \mid c \implies c = ak \text { and } b \mid c \implies c = bj.$
$ak + bj = 2c = d \implies c \mid d.$
$d \mid a \implies a = dj.$
$c = ak = d(jk) \implies d \mid c.$
So, $c = d.$
$a \mid c \text { and } b \mid c \implies ab \mid cc \implies ab \mid cd.$
Does this make sense to you?
There is a mistake:
$$ak+bj = 2c = d$$
I agree, since $ak=bj=c$, that $ak+bj=2c$, but why would $2c$ be equal to $\gcd(a,b)?$