I am trying to prove this, but I don't know if I'm on the right track.
So far I've said $d=(a,c)=1$, therefore, $d|a, d|b,$ and $d|c$. I'm not sure what to do from here or if I'm even going in the right direction.
Please help!
I am trying to prove this, but I don't know if I'm on the right track.
So far I've said $d=(a,c)=1$, therefore, $d|a, d|b,$ and $d|c$. I'm not sure what to do from here or if I'm even going in the right direction.
Please help!
On
Ad absurdum: assume $(a, b) = n \gneqq 1$. You know $n | a$ and $n | b$. But since $b | c$, you have $n | c$. Hence $n | (a, c)$. Conclude.
On
Since
$(a, c) = 1, \tag 1$
there exist integers $x$, $y$ such that
$ax + cy = 1; \tag 2$
now if
$(a, b) = d > 1, \tag 3$
it follows that
$d \mid a, \; d \mid b; \tag 4$
but then
$b \mid c \Longrightarrow d \mid c; \tag 5$
in the light of (1), this implies
$d \mid ax + cy \Longrightarrow d \mid 1 \Rightarrow \Leftarrow d > 1; \tag 6$
this contradiction then forces
$(a, b) = 1. \tag 7$
If $(a,c)=1$, by Bezout identity there are $x,y\in\mathbb Z$ s.t. $$ax+cy=1.$$ Now $c=kb$ for a $k\in\mathbb Z$. Therefore $$ax+zb=1,$$ where $z=ky\in\mathbb Z$. Therefore, $(a,b)=1$ by Bezout identity.