How can I prove that if a there exists a complete graph with $m$ nodes that is planar, then all graphs with $m$ nodes must be planar. I know a complete planar graph has at most 4 nodes, and I think I could show it using that, but I assume there is a more direct route.
2026-03-28 02:10:31.1774663831
If a graph with m nodes is complete and planar, all graphs with m nodes are planar.
30 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PLANAR-GRAPHS
- max planarity and triangulation
- How to find a minimal planar covering of a graph
- Complete bipartite planar graphs
- Is graph Planar?
- Kuratowski's theorem on Planar graphs
- Graph Theory: Degree of regions in a planar graph
- On the Hex/Nash connection game theorem
- Graph Theory: There is only one planar graph with all vertices of degree 4 and 10 regions
- Intersection of circles and regions
- Which of these graphs is planar?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
All planar graphs satisfy the criteria
$$ |E| \leq 3 |V| - 6 $$
If we pick a particular value of $|V| = n$ (that is, we pick the number of vertices $n$), the maximum number of edges will be posessed by the completed graph on $k$ vertices - $K_n$
Hence, the maximum value of $|E|$ for a given $|V| = n$ is $E[K_n] = \binom{n}{2}$ (no. of edges of $K_n$)
So, if for $K_n$, $$|E[K_n]| \leq 3|n| - 6$$
Then any other graph of $n$ vertices, say $G$ will have $$E[G] \leq E[K_n]$$ and hence
$$ E[G] \leq E[K_n] \leq 3|n| - 6 $$ which means that $G$ is also planar since it satisfies the characteristic