Given is a statement $A$. Now I know the following for this particular statement:
If $A$ is decidable, then $A$ is true.
What can you conclude about the truth value of $A$? Obviously, if $A$ is true, then $A$ is decidable.
It seems like the decidability of $A$ does not really change the outcome, so I would assume that the truth value of $A$ is actually already determined before I decide what it is (with a proof).
My problem with this question probably comes from the fact that I do not know much about logic, (un)decidability or the mathematical axioms mathematicians are working with.
First, to clear up some possibly confusing terminology: "decidable" is usually a term applied to sets of formulas, and not individual formulas themselves. In this usage, it means that there exists an algorithm to decide whether a formula is a member of the set. However, there is another usage -- typically older -- which I will assume you are referring to in this question. By the older usage, we say that $A$ is decidable in a logical system $\mathcal{L}$ (roughly, a set of axioms) if either $A$ or its negation $\lnot A$ is provable in $\mathcal{L}$. I will assume this usage for the remainder of the answer.
With this usage in mind for decidable, there are still two ambiguities left in your question. First,
(1) Do you know it in the sense you have a proof, or we are just supposing it is true? And second,
(2) when you say "$A$ is decidable" -- decidable in what logical system $\mathcal{L}$?
Depending on the answers to (1) and (2), there are some things we can say. A famous result is: if the answer to (2) is ZFC, and the answer to (1) is that not only do you claim this is true -- you have a proof of in ZFC! -- then we can actually conclude from your statement ("if $A$ is decidable, then $A$ is true)" that $A$ is itself true! This is a consequence of Löb's theorem, which is closely related to Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. Löb's theorem states:
To apply it to your case: your statement is that if $A$ is decidable, then $A$ is true. It follows that if $A$ is provable, then $A$ is true (since decidability means either $A$ or $\lnot A$ is provable). So what Löb's theorem states is that the only way to know your statement (in a fixed logical system) is for $A$ itself to be known.