If a language L logspace reduces to SAT, does L also reduce to SAT in polynomial time?
2026-04-05 00:03:56.1775347436
IF a language L logspace reduces to SAT, does L
379 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPUTATIONAL-COMPLEXITY
- Product of sums of all subsets mod $k$?
- Proving big theta notation?
- Little oh notation
- proving sigma = BigTheta (BigΘ)
- sources about SVD complexity
- Is all Linear Programming (LP) problems solvable in Polynomial time?
- growth rate of $f(x)= x^{1/7}$
- Unclear Passage in Cook's Proof of SAT NP-Completeness: Why The Machine M Should Be Modified?
- Minimum Matching on the Minimum Triangulation
- How to find the average case complexity of Stable marriage problem(Gale Shapley)?
Related Questions in COMPUTABILITY
- Are all infinite sets of indices of computable functions extensional?
- Simple applications of forcing in recursion theory?
- Proof of "Extension" for Rice's Theorem
- How to interpret Matiyasevich–Robinson–Davis–Putnam in term of algebraic geometry or geometry?
- Does there exist a weakly increasing cofinal function $\kappa \to \kappa$ strictly below the diagonal?
- Why isn't the idea of "an oracle for the halting problem" considered self-contradictory?
- is there any set membership of which is not decidable in polynomial time but semidecidable in P?
- The elementary theory of finite commutative rings
- Is there any universal algorithm converting grammar to Turing Machine?
- Is the sign of a real number decidable?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Shortest answer: Yes.
Short answer: Yes, for the same reason that LOGSPACE $\subseteq$ P.
Less short: If the number of tape squares used is logarithmic, then the number of possible tape configurations is polynomial, and since the tape configurations mustn't repeat, the time taken is polynomial too.
In horrible detail: Let $M$ be a TM that performs a logspace reduction of $L$ to SAT. Say that $M$ has $N$ states and a tape alphabet with $A$ symbols. Since $M$ performs a logspace reduction of $L$, the space taken by $M$ in transforming any element $s$ of $L$ to a SAT instance must be bounded above by $c\cdot\log|s|$ for some constant $c$.
$\def\s#1{\langle T_{#1}, S_{#1}\rangle}$Consider a transformation by machine $M$ of a string $s$ to an instance of SAT. At time $n$, $M$ is in state $S_n$ and its tape is in state $T_n$. There can't be two different times at which both state and tape are the same, or $M$ would be in an infinite loop, which we know doesn't happen. So the running time of $M$ is bounded above by the number of possible (state, tape configuration) pairs, which is $N$ times the total number of possible tape configurations. But at most $c\cdot\log|s|$ tape squares are used, so the total number of tape configurations is at most $A^{c\cdot\log|s|}$, and thus the total time is bounded by $$N\cdot A^{c\cdot\log|s|}.$$ This is a polynomial in $|s|$, so the whole computation is time-bounded by a polynomial in $|s|$, for any $s\in L$, and therefore $L$ is polynomial-time reducible to SAT.