Prove that if the same number t is added to each element of the matrix, then the determinant of the new matrix is equal to the determinant of the original matrix plus t, multiplied by the sum of cofactors of all elements of the original matrix.
2026-04-04 07:56:36.1775289396
If a same variable $t$ is added to all entries of a matrix $A$, express $\det(A)$ as a certain first degree polynomial in $t$.
69 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in DETERMINANT
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Let $T:V\to W$ on finite dimensional vector spaces, is it possible to use the determinant to determine that $T$ is invertible.
- Optimization over images of column-orthogonal matrices through rotations and reflections
- Effect of adding a zero row and column on the eigenvalues of a matrix
- Geometric intuition behind determinant properties
- Help with proof or counterexample: $A^3=0 \implies I_n+A$ is invertible
- Prove that every matrix $\in\mathbb{R}^{3\times3}$ with determinant equal 6 can be written as $AB$, when $|B|=1$ and $A$ is the given matrix.
- Properties of determinant exponent
- How to determine the characteristic polynomial of the $4\times4$ real matrix of ones?
- The determinant of the sum of a positive definite matrix with a symmetric singular matrix
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Some notations : Let $\mathbf{1}$ be the column vector of ones and $\text{com}(M)$ the matrix of cofactors of $M$ (also called "co-matrix"). Let $\Omega= \mathbf{1}^T\mathbf{1}$ be the matrix with all its entries equal to one. Let $s$ be the sum of all cofactors of a matrix $A$.
We have to prove that
Here are 2 proofs :
First proof :
Let us recall Cramer's formula :
$$A^{-1}=\dfrac{1}{\det(A)}(\text{com}(A))^T \ \ \text{written under the form} \ \ \ \text{com}(A)=\det(A).(A^{-1})^T\tag{1}$$
Besides, it is easy to establish that the sum of all entries of a matrix $M$ can be written
$$\mathbf{1}^TM\mathbf{1} \tag{2}$$
Consequently, combining (1) and (2),
$$s:=\det(A)\mathbf{1}^T(A^{-1})^T\mathbf{1}\tag{3}$$
The identity we are going to establish is a consequence of the matrix-determinant lemma under the form :
$$\det(I+uv^T)=1+u^Tv\tag{4}$$
(where $u$ and $v$ are column vectors).
Let us take $v:=\mathbf{1}$ and $u:=tA^{-1}\mathbf{1}$. (1) becomes :
$$\det(I+tA^{-1}\mathbf{1}\mathbf{1}^T)=1+t \ \mathbf{1}^T(A^{-1})^T\mathbf{1}$$
Multiplying LHS and RHS by $\det(A)$, one gets :
$$\det(A(I+tA^{-1}\Omega))=\det(A)+t \ \det(A)\mathbf{1}^T(A^{-1})^T\mathbf{1}$$
(denoting by $\Omega$ the matrix whose all entries are equal to $1$).
Using (2), we have established (*)
Final remarks :
1) matrix-determinant lemma is sometimes called Sylvester's determinant equation, see for example (https://mathoverflow.net/q/186672).
2) We have assumed $A$ invertible. It isn't compulsory, as will be seen in the second proof.
Second proof :
Let us take, for the sake of simplicity the case of a $3 \times 3$ matrix.
We can write, by calling $A_k$ the $k$th column of $A$ :
$\det (A + t\Omega) = \det[A_1+t\mathbf{1},A_2+t\mathbf{1},A_3+t\mathbf{1}] $
$=\underbrace{\det[A_1,A_2,A_3]}_{\det(A)} +t \underbrace{(\det[\mathbf{1},A_2,A_3]+\det[A_1,\mathbf{1},A_3]+ \det[A_1,A_2,\mathbf{1}])}_{s'} \tag{5} $
by multilinearity of $\det$ function ; all other terms having at least two $t\mathbf{1}$, like $\det[t\mathbf{1},A_2,t\mathbf{1}]$ are zero because a determinant with two identical columns is zero.
Besides, it is not difficult to see that $s'=s$ because, by (Laplace) expansion of the different determinants with respect to their "$\mathbf{1}$" columns, we get, by groups of three, all the cofactors of $A$.