A friend of mine took an aptitude test by Deloitte. One of the questions was an interesting logical puzzle:
All applicants are motivated professionals
Some professionals are unmotivated
Select the correct answer:
1) engineers are unmotivated
2) some applicants are unmotivated
3) some professionals are applicants
4) none of these conclusions is logically inescapable
Thinking purely mathematically, the answer was clear to me, and so it was to my mathematics friends. However, my friend and her friends seem to interpret the question a little bit different. It's interesting to see the different approaches to this question.
Unfortunately, we were not able to see the correct answer. What do you think?


There's wiggle room in the statements, of course. Does "engineers are unmotivated" mean "all engineers are unmotivated" or "some engineers are unmotivated"? Is an engineer a professional or not?
But anyway, we can't say anything.
If engineers don't have to be professionals:
Consider a world with no applicants; exactly one unmotivated professional, who is not an engineer; and exactly one engineer, who is motivated. Then the preconditions hold, but none of the postconditions.
If all engineers are professionals: consider a world with no applicants, one motivated engineer, and one unmotivated non-engineer.