I know that since $g$ is holomorphic, then the zeros of $g$ are isolated.
But why should $f/g$ then be holomorphic and meromorphic?
I don't understand how to continue because how would we know what happens to $f/g$ at the zeros of $g$?
I know that since $g$ is holomorphic, then the zeros of $g$ are isolated.
But why should $f/g$ then be holomorphic and meromorphic?
I don't understand how to continue because how would we know what happens to $f/g$ at the zeros of $g$?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
If $z_0$ is a zero of $g$ of order $m$ and if $f(z_0)\neq0$, then $z_0$ is a pole of order $m$ of $\frac fg$.
And if $z_0$ is a zero of $g$ of order $m$ and zero of order $n$ of $f$, then:
So, yes, $\frac fg$ is a meromorphic function.