I derived the volume of a cone using two approaches and compared the results.
First I integrated a circle of radius $r$ over the height $h$ to get the expression: $$V_1=\frac{1}{3}\pi r^2 h$$
Then I considered a polygonal pyramid of infinite sides.
An n-sided polygon with apothem $r$ has an area of: $$A=nr^2\tan{\frac{180°}{n}}$$
Integrating this over the height $h$ gives the expression for the area of the n-sided polygonal pyramid as: $$V_2=\frac{1}{3}n\tan{\frac{180°}{n}}r^2 h$$
Equating $V_1$ and $V_2$ implies that: $$ \lim_{n \to \infty} \left(n\tan{\frac{180°}{n}}\right) = \pi $$
So is it true to say that: $$\infty\tan{\frac{180°}{\infty}} = \pi$$
But: $$\tan{\frac{180°}{\infty}}=0$$
So: $$\infty (0)=\pi$$
Can anyone shed some light on this surprising result?
That is correct. 180 degrees is $\pi$ radians. If you change variables from $n$ to $\theta$ with $\theta = \frac{1}{n}$, you get $$ \lim_{n \to \infty} \left(n\tan{\frac{180}{n}}\right) = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\tan{\pi x}}{x} $$ and that is, in fact $\pi$.
Not at all. The limit of a product of functions is the product of the limits of the functions provided those functions have limits in the first place. Since $\lim_{n\to\infty} n$ does not exist, you cannot apply the limit laws that way.
In short: $\infty$ is not a number. Treating it as a number leads to madness (or, at least, contradiction).