While revising the chapter complex number, when i was reading the the concept of the cube roots of unity, I read $\omega^3=1$, where $\omega$ is the cube root of unity other than 1, then $\omega ^5=\omega^3.\omega^2=\omega^2(\because\omega^3=1)$
the above thing is we all know, is correct, but you see i don't know how my brain functioned and i thought that $$\omega^5=(\omega^3)^{\frac 53}=(1)^\frac 53=1 \{\because \omega^3=1\}$$
but you know, this is wrong, i don't know how this wrong but i can see this to be wrong because if this true then $\omega ^k=1, k\in R$.
So how $$\omega^5=(\omega^3)^{\frac 53}=(1)^\frac 53=1 $$ is wrong? what are the wrong assumptions which is taken by me while writing that statement?
The wrong assumption lies in the step where you write:
This is wrong since it assumes the existence of a mapping $u$ similar to the power $t↦t^\frac35$ on $\mathbb{R}^+$ in the sense that $u(z^5)=z^3$ for every $z$ in $\mathbb{C}$. Such a mapping $u$ does not exist eventhough $u$ does exist on $\mathbb{R}$.