This is basically a deviation of Rouche's Theorem from what I can tell. My first instinct was to do this via induction in which we know that $p=0$ we would have Rouche's theorem. But it gets trickier when you try to do it for cases like $p+1$ for instance. Then it varies more or less depending on $f(z)$. Can any of you give me some suggestion on tackling this?
2026-04-29 18:15:31.1777486531
If $p>0$ demonstrate that the $1/2\pi i$ the line integral of $z^p f'(z)/f(z)$ is $\sum (z_k)^p$
38 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-ANALYSIS
- Minkowski functional of balanced domain with smooth boundary
- limit points at infinity
- conformal mapping and rational function
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- If $u+v = \frac{2 \sin 2x}{e^{2y}+e^{-2y}-2 \cos 2x}$ then find corresponding analytical function $f(z)=u+iv$
- Is there a trigonometric identity that implies the Riemann Hypothesis?
- order of zero of modular form from it's expansion at infinity
- How to get to $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} \, dz =n_0-n_p$ from Cauchy's residue theorem?
- If $g(z)$ is analytic function, and $g(z)=O(|z|)$ and g(z) is never zero then show that g(z) is constant.
- Radius of convergence of Taylor series of a function of real variable
Related Questions in COMPLEX-NUMBERS
- Value of an expression involving summation of a series of complex number
- Minimum value of a complex expression involving cube root of a unity
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- Locus corresponding to sum of two arguments in Argand diagram?
- Logarithmic function for complex numbers
- To find the Modulus of a complex number
- relation between arguments of two complex numbers
- Equality of two complex numbers with respect to argument
- Trouble computing $\int_0^\pi e^{ix} dx$
- Roots of a complex equation
Related Questions in ROOTS
- How to solve the exponential equation $e^{a+bx}+e^{c+dx}=1$?
- Roots of a complex equation
- Do Irrational Conjugates always come in pairs?
- For $f \in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ , $\deg(\gcd_{\mathbb{Z}_q}(f, x^p - 1)) \geq \deg(\gcd_{\mathbb{Q}}(f, x^p - 1))$
- The Heegner Polynomials
- Roots of a polynomial : finding the sum of the squares of the product of two roots
- Looking for references about a graphical representation of the set of roots of polynomials depending on a parameter
- Approximating the first +ve root of $\tan(\lambda)= \frac{a\lambda+b}{\lambda^2-ab}$, $\lambda\in(0,\pi/2)$
- Find suitable scaling exponent for characteristic polynomial and its largest root
- Form an equation whose roots are $(a-b)^2,(b-c)^2,(c-a)^2.$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $f,g: D \to \mathbb{C}$ be analytic functions. Then one can show that if $\gamma$ is a simple closed curve in $D$ enclosing finitely many roots $z_k$ of $f$, then $$ \int_{\gamma} g(z) \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} \, dz = 2\pi i\sum_{k} n_k g(z_k), $$ where $n_k$ is the order of the root $z_k$.
Proof: the integrand is meromorphic, with singularities at $z_k$, and nowhere else. By the Residue Theorem, it suffices to compute the residues at $z_k$, sum them, and multiply by $2\pi i$. By the definition of analytic, one can find for $z_k$ a sufficiently small disc $D_k$ on which $f(z) = (z-z_k)^{n_k} h(z)$, where $h(z)$ is an analytic function that does not vanish on $D_k$. Then the integrand can be evaluated in this disc as $$ g(z) \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} = g(z) \frac{n_k (z-z_k)^{n_k-1}h(z) + (z-z_k)^{n_k}h'(z)}{(z-z_k)^{n_k}h(z)} = g(z) \left( \frac{n_k}{z-z_k} + \frac{h'(z)}{h(z)} \right), $$ and hence, since $h(z)$ does not vanish, the residue at $z_k$ is $n_k g(z_k)$, and the Residue Theorem gives you the rest. $\square$
Remark: there are generalisations of this to meromorphic $f$, but it then becomes more complicated to express: one uses the definition of pole instead of zero, and basically everything else comes out in the same way.