I want to show the following: Let $u \in C^2(\Omega)$ be a harmonic function and $\overline{B(x, r)} \subset \Omega \subset \mathbb R^n$ for some $x \in \Omega$ and $r > 0$. For $\alpha \in \mathbb N^n$ a multi-index, I want to show that $$|D^\alpha u| \le \frac{c}{r^{n + |\alpha|}} \|u\|_{L^1(B(x, r))},$$ for $c = c(\alpha, n) > 0.$ I have absolutely no idea how to do that.. Obviously, by induction, it is enough to show the statement for $\alpha = (1, 0, \ldots, 0)$, and I applied Stokes' theorem to get rid of the derivative, which gave me \begin{align} |\partial_1 u(x)| &= \left|\frac{c}{r^n}\int_{B(x, r)}\partial_1 u(y)dy\right|\\ &= \left|\frac{c}{r^n}\int_{\partial B(x, r)} u(z) \nu_1d\sigma(z)\right|\\ &\le \frac{c}{r^n}\|u\|_{L^1(\partial B(x, r))}, \end{align} but I wasn't able to get any further than that. Any help is welcome.
2026-04-06 22:45:11.1775515511
If $u$ is a harmonic function, then $|D^\alpha u(x)| \le c\|u\|_{L^1(B(x, r))}/r^{n + |\alpha|}$
123 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in HARMONIC-FUNCTIONS
- Harmonicity is a local property?
- Harmonic functions satisfying given inequality
- Is there Phragmen-Lindelof for $\mathbb{C}_+$ where $f$ is not bounded on $i\mathbb{R}$ but has polynomial growth?
- Solution of a non homogeneous Laplace equation on the unit disk.
- Complex Analysis - Harmonic function as real part of holomorphic function
- Show that u is harmonic
- Physicists construct their potentials starting from the Laplace equation, why they do not use another differential operator, like theta Θ?
- Prove a family of harmonic functions is locally bounded
- Why is $ u=\log(\sqrt{x^2+y^2})$ not harmonic for $x^2 + y^2 <1$?
- Modulus and argument of a holomorphic function.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Your work is totally fine, but I don't think it can obtain what you desire to derive. (Observe that the power of $R$ in the denominator is $n$, instead of $n+1$, for example.)
To prove it, we start with the 1-st derivative. We use the mean value formula on $B\left(x,\frac{r}{2}\right)$ instead. Note that $$ \left|\partial_i u\left(x\right)\right|=\frac{2n}{r}\left\|u\right\|_{L^{\infty}\left(\partial B\left(x,\frac{r}{2}\right)\right)}=\frac{2n}{r}\left|u\left(p\right)\right|$$ for some $p\in \partial B\left(x,\frac{r}{2}\right)$. Now, note that $B\left(p,\frac{r}{2}\right)\subset B\left(x,r\right)\subset \Omega$ (This is crucial), so we have $$ \left|u\left(p\right)\right|\leq \frac{2^n}{\omega_nr^n}\left\|u\right\|_{L^1\left(B\left(p,\frac{r}{2}\right)\right)}\leq \frac{2^n}{\omega_nr^n}\left\|u\right\|_{L^1\left(B\left(x,r\right)\right)},$$ where $\omega_n$ is the volume of the unit $n$-ball. Thus, $$ \left|\partial_i u\left(x\right)\right| \leq \frac{2n}{r}\cdot \frac{2^n}{\omega_nr^n}\left\|u\right\|_{L^1\left(B\left(x,r\right)\right)}=\frac{c}{r^{n+1}}\left\|u\right\|_{L^1\left(B\left(x,r\right)\right)}.$$
For the rest of derivatives, you can use inductive argument to derive, and the important step is you need to use the smaller ball so that you can obtain the result by combining the estimate data on the boundary, as it is shown above. ($B\left(x,\frac{r}{k}\right)$ would do the job if you want to derive the $k$-th derivative estimate from $k-1$-th, but you should be aware of the choice of balls of the boundary point; namely, you cannot take a ball so large that it exceeds $\Omega$.)