I'm working out some QM problems and need to clarify the procedure for calculating the partial of an implicit function. What's needed is to differentiate a wave function twice with respect to t. Here's the function: $φ(x,t) = e^{i(ax − bt)}ψ(x − vt,t)$. My answer differs from the books. I'm messing up the derivative of psi. My question is since t shows up twice in psi how do you handle this? Differentiate each piece seperately then add them? Not sure. Thanks.
2026-03-27 21:53:26.1774648406
Implicit partial derivative of wave function
61 Views Asked by user142666 https://math.techqa.club/user/user142666/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in IMPLICIT-DIFFERENTIATION
- Derivative of implicit functions
- Is the Inverse Function Theorem Global?
- Show that $e^{xy}+y=x-1$ is an implicit solution to the differential equation $\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{e^{-xy}-y}{e^{-xy}+x}$
- How to see the sign of an entangled PDE
- Find the value of $\theta$ that maximizes $t_c$.
- What is the sign of the result when applying the implicit function theorem?
- Implicit-differentiation with two surfaces
- Does this entangled PDE capture the derivative?
- Implicit differentiation. Confusing assumption.
- Chain rule problem: given $f(x)=\sqrt{4x+7}$ and $g(x)=e^{x+4}$, compute $f(g(x))'$.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Your idea is right about breaking up the problem in parts, but it's a bit more sophisticated than just adding them up. First, note that $\phi$ is a product. The derivative of a product is obtained by Leibniz's rule:
$$\partial_t\phi(x,t) = \partial_t(e^{i(ax − bt)}) \psi(x − vt,t) + e^{i(ax − bt)} \partial_t (\psi(x − vt,t))$$
I shortened the notation for the partial derivative with respect to $t$ as $\partial_t$. This can be further worked out to
$$\partial_t\phi(x,t) = -ibe^{i(ax − bt)} \psi(x − vt,t) + e^{i(ax − bt)} \partial_t (\psi(x − vt,t))$$
Second, there is the last factor in the last term, which is a composite function. Here you should use the chain rule. I'm going to notate the derivative with respect to the first variable of $\psi$ as $\partial_1\psi$, likewise for the derivative w.r.t. the second variable $\partial_2\psi$. Then, we have that
$$\partial_t (\psi(x − vt,t)) = -v\partial_1 \psi(x − vt,t) + \partial_2 \psi(x − vt,t)$$
Combining everything we have
$$\partial_t\phi(x,t) = -ibe^{i(ax − bt)} \psi(x − vt,t) -v e^{i(ax − bt)} \partial_1 \psi(x − vt,t) + e^{i(ax − bt)} \partial_2 \psi(x − vt,t)$$
If you still have trouble with this, I suggest you check up the chain rule for partial derivatives in particular.