A $3 \times 3$ symmetric matrix has $6$ independent components: \begin{equation} \{ S_{ij} \} = \begin{pmatrix} S_{11} & S_{12} & S_{13} \\ S_{12} & S_{22} & S_{23} \\ S_{13} & S_{23} & S_{33} \end{pmatrix} \end{equation} If we decompose this matrix in a symmetric and traceless part: \begin{equation} \{ T_{ij} \} \equiv \begin{pmatrix} S_{11} & S_{12} & S_{13} \\ S_{12} & S_{22} & S_{23} \\ S_{13} & S_{23} & -(S_{11} + S_{22}) \end{pmatrix} \end{equation} then it has $5$ independent components. I believe this means that the trace: \begin{equation} S_{ii} = S_{11}+S_{22}+S_{33} \end{equation} must only have $1$ independent component? However, I do not see why this would be true, because if I would look (naively) at the above equation, then I would assume the trace has $3$ independent components. Can anybody explain me this apparent contradiction?
Thanks!
P.S. The motivation for this question is based on the decomposition of $\mathrm{SO(3)}$ representation in the antisymmetric part, the traceless symmetric part and the trace: \begin{equation} 3 \otimes 3 = 3 \oplus 5 \oplus 1 \end{equation}
To determine the matrix $S$, we need 6 independent components (degrees of freedom), where 5 out of 6 comes from $S_{ij}$ and the other is the trace. What we concern is how many degrees of freedom of the trace provides. And obviously it's 1 because $\mathrm{tr}S\in\mathbb F$, no matter how many independent components are required to determine the trace. Yes, the trace itself has 3 independent componets. The point is, those three components contributes to only one out of 6 numbers for $S$.