$A,B$ are $n\times n $ matrix over a field, and $AB=BA$. Let $C=(A\mid B)$ (an $n\times 2n $ matrix). How to prove the following inequality about rank. $$\text{rank}(A)+\text{rank}(B)\ge \text{rank}(C)+\text{rank}(AB)$$ The difficulty is how I should interpret $AB=BA$. I tried to imitate the proof of Sylvester Rank Inequality but failed.
2026-03-31 17:23:33.1774977813
Inequality about rank of matrix
98 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in MATRIX-RANK
- Bases for column spaces
- relation between rank of power of a singular matrix with the algebraic multiplicity of zero
- How to determine the rank of the following general $\mathbb{R}$-linear transformation.
- How to prove the dimension identity of subspace? i.e. $\dim(V_1) + \dim(V_2) = \dim(V_1 + V_2) + \dim(V_1 \cap V_2)$
- How can I prove that $[T]_B$ is a reversible matrix?
- can I have $\det(A+B)=0$ if $\det(A)=0$ and $\det(B) \neq 0$?
- Let $A$ be a diagonalizable real matrix such as $A^3=A$. Prove that $\mbox{rank}(A) = \mbox{tr}(A^2)$
- Row permuation of a matrix for a non-zero diagonal
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- Rank of Matrix , Intersection of 3 planes
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $\text{Ker}(M)$ denote the left kernel of a matrix $M$. Note that if $M$ has $n$ rows, then $\dim (\text{Ker}(M)) = n - \text{rk}(M)$. Thus, we can rewrite the inequality we need to prove as \begin{equation} \dim(\text{Ker}(A)) + \dim(\text{Ker}(B)) \leq \dim(\text{Ker}(C)) + \dim(\text{Ker}(AB)) \end{equation} It follows immediately that the left kernel of $C$ is $\text{Ker}(A) \cap \text{Ker}(B)$, hence \begin{align} \dim(\text{Ker}(C)) &= \dim(\text{Ker}(A) \cap \text{Ker}(B)) \\ &= \dim(\text{Ker}(A)) + \dim(\text{Ker}(B)) - \dim(\langle \text{Ker}(A), \text{Ker}(B) \rangle), \end{align} by Grassmann's identity. Thus, we need to prove that \begin{equation} \dim(\text{Ker}(AB)) \geq \dim(\langle \text{Ker}(A), \text{Ker}(B) \rangle). \end{equation} We will do this by proving that $\langle \text{Ker}(A), \text{Ker}(B) \rangle$ is a subspace of $\text{Ker}(AB)$. Indeed, take a vector $v \in \langle \text{Ker}(A), \text{Ker}(B) \rangle$, then $v = v_A + v_B$ for some vectors $v_A \in \text{Ker}(A)$ and $v_B \in \text{Ker}(v_B)$. Then, using that $A$ and $B$ commute, \begin{equation} ABv = AB(v_A + v_B) = A(B v_A + B v_B) = A (B v_A + \vec 0) = AB v_A = BA v_A = B \vec 0 = \vec 0. \end{equation} This concludes the proof.