
So existence and uniqueness follows given (c1) and (c2). Is it possible that existence holds if (c1) only holds? I saw a similar result in other books (Showalter's Monotone Operators in Banach Spaces..)) but am not sure if the inf-sup condition is the same or slightly different.
If this is true, why is not written clearly that (c2) is only there for uniqueness???? And are there other methods that can replace (c2)?
Condition (c2) is needed to ensure that the underlying operator A (defined by the condition (Au,v)=a(u,v)) has Range(A)=W. In particular, since Range(A) is a closed subspace of V (thanks to (c1)), it suffices to show that Range(A)^\perp is trivial. The condition (c2) shows this is indeed the case.