If infiniti is the highest theoretical number then what is the opposite of it? At first glance one might think 0 but that is not true. Research (aka a quick google search) has shown me that the opposite of infinity is called infinitesimal(sorry if I spelled that wrong) which is another unquantifiable number but it is basically zero point infinite zeros followed by a single one, as I understand it. Now if the definition of negative is “the opposite of a number” and we know that 0.000… infinitely, followed by a one, is the opposite of infinity, then we know that because of the transitive property then -infinity=0.0…1. This means that the highest theoretical negative number is actually a positive number. This leads me to think that there are no negative numbers and that all negative numbers are just decimal. Is my logic completely flawed or does it make sense?
2026-04-08 12:31:38.1775651498
Infinity and Negative Infinity Logical Query
248 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in INFINITY
- Does Planck length contradict math?
- No two sided limit exists
- Are these formulations correct?
- Are these numbers different from each other?
- What is wrong in my analysis?
- Where does $x$ belong to?
- Divide by zero on Android
- Why is the set of all infinite binary sequences uncountable but the set of all natural numbers are countable?
- Is a set infinite if there exists a bijection between the topological space X and the set?
- Infinitesimal Values
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Your question makes a lot of separate claims that each have different issues, so I think the best way to clear things up is to comment on some individual lines.
Clarifying the Logic
"Infinity" (note the "y" at the end in English) is not just one idea, and the ideas related to infinity are not always called "number"s, and never have all the nice properties that "real numbers" do. For a survey of some related ideas, see the English Wikipedia page for Infinity or the Math StackExchange question Understanding infinity.
Dictionary.com has a definition for "opposite": "contrary or radically different in some respect common to both...". This can me used in a variety of different ways in mathematics. Here are two main ones:
This entire line of reasoning is invalid because you are treating the two ideas of "opposite" above as if they are the same thing. As HallaSurvivor alluded to in a comment, this is very similar to saying: "$-2$ is an opposite of $2$ because it's the same size but negative. And $1/2$ is an opposite of $2$ because multiplying by $1/2$ shrinks something by the same factor that multiplying by $2$ grows it. Since they're both 'opposites', $-2=1/2$."
Clarifying Infinity
As discussed above, there are at least two senses of "opposite" you might be interested in: something like "negative infinity" and something like "reciprocal infinity". What sense these do or do not make depends a lot on what meaning of infinity you're working with. Without getting into all of the possible interpretations in detail, I'll just outline a few key examples.
Beyond regular decimals?
This would not represent a real number, and does not have a standard definition. People have tried making up new number systems where this sort of thing would convey some meaning, but it's not easy and to my knowledge hasn't ever been shown to work out nicely. This matter is discussed a bit in answers to the Math StackExchange question Is it possible to create the smallest real positive number by axiome?.
Calculus $\infty$
In Calculus, the lemniscate $\infty$ is used to represent an idea like "a function or sequence gets (and stays) greater than any finite positive number". For instance, we might say "the limit of $(1,4,9,16,\ldots)$ is $\infty$" because the sequence stays above $100$ after the tenth term, stays above $1000$ after the $31^{\text{st}}$ term, etc.
Analogously, it's common to then use $-\infty$ to represent things that get and stay less than any finite negative number". For example, $(17-1,17-4,17-9,17-16,17-25,\ldots)=(16,13,8,1,-8,\ldots)$ might be said to have a limit of $-\infty$. Note that we cannot usefully think of this $-\infty$ as an additive inverse to $\infty$. For example, if we add the two sequences above term by term, we get $(17,17,\ldots)$ which stays at $17$ and does not approach $0$.
As for $1/\infty$, since the reciprocals of a sequence that gets larger and larger get smaller and smaller, some may write $1/\infty=0$. In this context, people would not generally call that an infinitesimal, just $0$.
Complex Calculus $\infty$
When doing Calculus with the complex numbers in "complex analysis", we are not limited to two directions on the number line since there is a whole complex plane to work with. In that context, we often use the symbol $\infty$ to represent things that get and stay further away from $0$ than any finite positive distance, no matter the direction. A way of visualizing that is the Riemann sphere. In that usage, both sequences above have numbers moving away from zero, so their behavior might both be represented by $\infty$, and there is no $-\infty$ (or perhaps we would declare $-\infty=\infty$).
Similarly to the real numbers, reciprocals of complex numbers far from $0$ are close to $0$, so it would be common to write $1/\infty=0$.
Infinite Sizes
Another common use of the ideas of infinity is in giving names to the sizes of infinite sets in the study of "cardinality". But every set has at least $0$ elements, so "negative infinity" would make no sense in that sort of context. And it doesn't make sense to have between $0$ and $1$ elements, so "reciprocal infinity" wouldn't make sense either.
Abstract Settings
In more obscure mathematics, we might have a sort of "number system" where arithmetic and order work out in a fairly normal way, but there are now new numbers larger than any positive integer. Many of these are called "non-Archimedean ordered fields". In such a system, there is not just one "infinity" so we would not use the symbol $\infty$, but we could have "an infinite element $H$" and then things like $1+H>H$, $-H+H=0$, and $0<1/H<1/100$ might all make perfect sense.
In this context, "positive infinite" would mean "greater than any positive integer". And "positive infinitesimal" would mean "positive but less than the reciprocal of any positive integer". $0$ might be considered an "infinitesimal", but $1/0$ would still not make sense.