Injectivity of the function $i\sqrt{2}\sin{z/2}$

143 Views Asked by At

Let $U=\{z\in\mathbb{C}:|Re(z)|<\pi\}$. Then why is the function $f:U\rightarrow f(U), f(z)=i\sqrt{2}\sin{z/2}$ injective and is there a way to describe $f(U)$?

2

There are 2 best solutions below

14
On BEST ANSWER

A straight-forward calculation shows that $$ \frac{\left( \dfrac{w+i}{w-i} \right)^2 + 1}{\left( \dfrac{w+i}{w-i} \right)^2 - 1} = \frac{1}{2i} \bigl( w - \frac 1w \bigr ) \, . $$ With $w = e^{i z/2}$ it follows that $$ \sin \frac z2 = \frac{\left( \dfrac{e^{i z/2}+i}{e^{i z/2}-i} \right)^2 + 1}{\left( \dfrac{e^{i z/2}+i}{e^{i z/2}-i} \right)^2 - 1} $$ which is a composition of the mappings $$ z \to e^{i z/2}, z \to \frac{z+i}{z-i}, z \to z^2, z \to \frac{z+1}{z-1} $$ Now you can investigate the injectivity and compute the image in four steps:

  • Show that $z \to e^{i z/2}$ is injective in $U$ and maps $U$ to the right halfplane.
  • Show that $z \to \frac{z+i}{z-i}$ is a bijective mapping of the right halfplane to the upper halfplane.
  • Show that $z \to z^2$ is a bijective mapping of the upper halfplane to $\Bbb C \setminus [0, \infty)$.
  • Show that $z \to \frac{z+1}{z-1}$ is a bijective mapping of $\Bbb C \setminus [0, \infty)$ to $\Bbb C \setminus ((-\infty, -1] \cup [1, \infty))$.

Finally multiply by $i \sqrt 2$.

In the second and fourth step you can use that Möbius transformations are bijective mappings of the extended complex plane onto itself, and map lines or circles to lines or circles.

0
On

Since $$\sin(z)=\frac{e^{iz}-e^{-iz}}{2i}$$

we may write

$$f(z)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(e^{iz/2}-e^{-iz/2}\right)$$

Suppose there's some $z \in U$ and $s \in \mathbb{C}$ with $z+2s \in U$ and $f(z)=f(z+2s)$. Notice the first condition implies $\left| \Re(s) \right|<\pi$, so $s \in U$ too. Then:

\begin{aligned} &e^{iz/2}e^{is}-e^{-iz/2}e^{-is}=e^{iz/2}-e^{-iz/2}\\ \Rightarrow\,\, &e^{iz/2}\left(e^{is}-1\right)=e^{-iz/2}\left(e^{-is}-1\right) \end{aligned}

The terms in parantheses are all nonzero unless $s=2k\pi$ for some $k \in \mathbb{Z}$. Because $s \in U$, this would imply $s=0$ and we'd have nothing to prove. Suppose hence that $s\neq 0$. Then:

\begin{aligned} \Rightarrow\,\, &e^{iz}=\frac{e^{-is}-1}{e^{is}-1}=-e^{-is}=e^{-i(s+\pi)} \end{aligned}

It follows that $z=-(s+\pi)+2k\pi$, or $z+s=(2k-1)\pi$ for some $k\in \mathbb{Z}$. Since $z, s \in U$, the signs of $\Re(z)$, $\Re(s)$ and $(2k-1)\pi$ must all be the same. We conclude that $\left|\Re(z+2s)\right|>\pi$, which contradicts $z+2s \in U$.

Since our assumption that $s\neq 0$ led to a contradiction, we must have $s=0$, that is, $f$ is injective on $U$.

Do you think you can take it from here and describe $f(U)$?