By an integral domain, we mean here, a ring (not necessarily with unity) in which $ab=0$ implies $a=0$ or $b=0$.
Question: If an integral domain without unity has positive characteristic, is it necessarily prime?
An integral domain $D$ is said to be of finite characteristic if there exists a positive integer $m$ such that $ma=0$ for all $a\in D$. [cf. Topics in Algebra- I. N. Herstein, 2nd Ed., p. 129]
My question is a slight modification of Problem 6 in [Topics in Algebra- I. N. Herstein, 2nd Ed., p. 130]
I will assume the characteristic of a non-unital ring is simply the exponent of the additive group, i.e. the smallest $n$ such that $na=0$ for every $a \in A$.
Then the argument that the characteristic is prime for integral domains follows the usual way:
So assume that $n=kl, \;\;\; 0<k , l <n$ is a composite number. Choose $a \in A$ such that $ra \neq 0$ for every $r = 1, 2, \dots, n-1$ (if there is no such element, the characteristic is ncessarily smaller than $n$). Thus, $ka \neq 0, \; la \neq 0$ but $(ka) \cdot (la)=kl a^2=na^2=0,$ contradicting the fact that $A$ was an integral domain. Thus, if the characteristic is positive, it is necessarily prime.