Let $x \to f(x,t) \in H_0^1(0,L)$ my equation is about the integration by part formula in this cas. I want to evaluate the quantity $$\int\limits_0^1 {{\partial _{xx}}f(x,t){\partial _t}f(x,t)} dx$$ so $$\int\limits_0^1 {{\partial _{xx}}f(x,t){\partial _t}f(x,t)} dx = {\partial _x}f(L,t){\partial _t}f(L,t) - {\partial _x}f(0,t){\partial _t}f(0,t) - \int\limits_0^1 {{\partial _x}f(x,t){\partial _{tx}}f(x,t)} dx$$ Do I have $${\partial _x}f(L,t){\partial _t}f(L,t) - {\partial _x}f(0,t){\partial _t}f(0,t)=0$$? Thank you.
2026-04-25 12:19:46.1777119586
Integration by part in Sobolev spaces
179 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in SOBOLEV-SPACES
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- $\mbox{Cap}_p$-measurability
- If $u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )$ is s.t. $\nabla u=0$ then $u$ is constant a.e.
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Variational Formulation - inhomogeneous Neumann boundary
- Why the Sobolev space $W^{1,2}(M,N)$ weak-sequencially closed in $W^{1,2}(\mathbb R^K)$?
- Sobolev space $H^s(Q)$ is Hilbert
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- How to define discrete Sobolev dual norm so that it can be computed?
- Weakly sequentially continuous maps
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Probably you need to be more precise about where your funtions live, for example to be able to define the left hand side of your equation you might want $f \in H^2$ and $ \partial_t f \in L^2.$
In any case the answer is yes, because for any fixed time $f(L,t) = f(0,t) =0.$ Where this statement can be made precise in terms of the trace operator. Hence - although a little bit informally: $\partial_t f(L,t) = \partial_t f(0,t) = 0.$
On the other hand for functions in $H^1_0$ you know that they wanish on the boundary, but you can´t say the same about the derivatives, so you can´t say that $\partial_xf(L,t) = 0$. Think about the fuction:
$$f(t)= \begin{cases} t+1 & -1 \le t \le 0 \\ 1-t & 0 \leq t \le 1 \end{cases} $$
I argue that $f \in H^1_0 (-1,1) $. In fact this function can be approximated in $H^1(-1,1)$ by the sequence of functions:
$$f_{\epsilon}(t)= \begin{cases} \frac{t}{1 - \epsilon}+1 & -1+ \epsilon \le t \le 0 \\ 1-\frac{t}{1 - \epsilon} & 0 \leq t \le 1 - \epsilon \\ 0 & \text{ elsewhere } \end{cases} $$
Now it should be clear that $f_{\epsilon} \in H^1_0.$ It follows that $f \in H^1_0.$
What is the value of $\partial f$ on the boundary?