Interpreting the solution to the wave equation on $(0,\infty)$

308 Views Asked by At

I need some verification on my intution of the solution to the wave equation on the $D=(0,\infty)$ subject to Dirchilet boundary conditions.

So the problem is

$\begin{cases} v_{tt}-c^2v_{xx}=0\quad\quad 0<x<\infty ,\;t>0\\ v(x,0)=\phi (x),\quad v_t(x,0)=\psi (x)\quad\quad x>0\\ v(0,t)=0\quad\quad t>0\;. \end{cases}$.

By the method of reflections, the initial datum $\phi$ and $\psi $ can be reflected to the whole line via odd extension which yields the auxiliary IVP

$u_{tt}-c^2u_{xx}\;,\quad\quad -\infty<x<\infty ,\;t>0$

$u(x,0)=\phi_{odd}(x),\quad u_t(x,0)=\psi _{odd}(x)$

whose solution $u$ is given by d'Alembert's formula.

The solution $v$ of the original problem, is then given by the restriction of $u$ for $x\ge 0$, that is

$v(x,t)=\frac{1}{2}[\phi_{odd}(x+ct)+\phi_{odd}(x-ct)]+\frac{1}{2c}\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct}\psi_{odd} (s)\;ds$.

Furthermore, after considering the case for $x>c|t|$ and $x<c|t|$, we can then write the solution $v$ as the piecewise function

$v(x,t)= \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2}[\phi (x+ct)+\phi (x-ct)]+\frac{1}{2c}\int_{x-ct}^{x+ct}\psi (s)\;ds\;,\quad\quad x>c|t|\\ \frac{1}{2}[\phi (x+ct)-\phi (ct-x)]+\frac{1}{2c}\int_{ct-x}^{ct+x}\psi (s)\;ds\;,\quad\quad \;x<c|t|. \end{cases}$

From what I understand, if $x>c|t|$, then the initial waveform splits in two and each wave travels as it would on the whole line. i.e, $t$ before the the wave $\phi (x+ct)$ reaches $x=0$.

Now, when $x<c|t|$, the wave $\phi (x+ct)$ reaches $x=0$ and begins to experience an "interference" from the imaginary wave created by the extension of the initial datum.

It this interpretation correct?

Thanks.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

2
On BEST ANSWER

Your interpretation is correct. The principal at work here is the method of images. The idea is that the "reflecting" constraint $v(0,t)$ can be eliminated by expanding the domain and adding an initial condition which automatically enforces the constraint. The idea is that by using the odd extension for the auxiliary PDE $u$, you introduce the symmetry $u(x,t)=-u(-x,t)$, which is preserved by the evolution of the PDE. This in particular means that $u(0,t)=0$ without having to impose any constants. You can then "forget" the $x<0$ half of the domain and the inteference from the virtual half can be reinterpreted as the reflection off of the barrier at $x=0$.

enter image description here

For a visualization, notice that the centerpoint of the above animation does not move; by covering up the right half, it will instead look like the right pulse is reflecting off this centerpoint.