Let $E\subset{\mathbb R}^n$ be a set of the type $I_1\times \dots \times I_n$, where $I_k$ are real intervals, and $X$ be and $n\times p$ real matrix. Suppose also that $rank(X)=p$ and $n>p$. Is there a quick way for checking whether the intersection between $E$ and the space generated by the columns of $X$ is empty or not?
2026-03-25 05:59:11.1774418351
Intersection of two sets
52 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MULTILINEAR-ALGEBRA
- How to get the missing brick of the proof $A \circ P_\sigma = P_\sigma \circ A$ using permutations?
- How to prove that $f\otimes g: V\otimes W\to X\otimes Y$ is a monomorphism
- Is the natural norm on the exterior algebra submultiplicative?
- A non-zero quantity associated to an invertible skew-symmetric matrix of even order.
- Silly Question about tensor products and universal property
- Why are bilinear maps represented as members of the tensor space $V^*\otimes V^*$ opposed to just members of the tensor space $V\otimes V$?
- universal property of the $n$-fold tensor product
- If $f:(\mathbb{K}^n)^n \rightarrow \mathbb{K}$ is multilinear and alternating, prove: $f(T(u_1),T(u_2),...,T(u_n)=\det(A)f(u_1,...,u_n)$
- Image of Young symmetrizer on tensor product decomposition
- Proof of $Af = \sum_{\sigma \in S_{k}} (Sgn \sigma) \sigma f$ is an alternating function.
Related Questions in REGRESSION-ANALYSIS
- Average distance between consecutive points in a one-dimensional auto-correlated sequence
- A question regarding standardized regression coefficient in a regression model with more than one independent variable
- find a linear function $f(x,y) = ax + by + c$ which minimizes the total square error
- Calculating Taylor coefficients by fitting
- Interpretation of Sampling Distribution and Relationship to Test Statistics
- How are the equations of non linear data determined?
- The expected value of mean sum of square for the simple linear regression
- For the simple linear regression model, show that the elements of the hat matrix $H$ are...
- Derivation of Maximum Likelihood Estimators for heteroskedasticity case of simple linear regression
- How to fit a cumulative time series?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
First of all we have to complete the set of $p$ vectors defined by the columns of $X$ in order to obtain $n$ columns. This can easily be accomplished by taking a standard basis vector $e_1$ and add it as a new column of $X$, if this doesn't augment the rank of $X$ then throw it away and try $e_2$. Continue this until you get a matrix $M$ of rank $n$ that can serve as a basis. Now consider the vectors that define the vertices of your set (there are $2^n$ of them) and convert the coefficients of these to the new base formed by the columns of $M$. Each vector (column) of $M$ defines a hyperplane (a linear space of dimension $n-1$). The $k$-th vector defines the hyperplane with equation $x_k=0$, so the hyperplane slices the set in two parts iff one vertex has another sign than any other vertex. Continue this for the first $p$ hyperplanes and for all the sets of two distinct vertices until you either find that they all lie on the same of the hyperplanes in wich case the intersection is empty, or you find a first case when two vertices are on different sides of the hyperplane and the intersection is nonempty. In fact you dont even have to check all couples of vertices but only those that are adjacent.