In a high school reference book, I read a question asking which of $\frac{1+e^x}2$ and $\frac{e^x-1}x$ is larger when $x>0$.
Of course, the question is technically easy to answer. E.g. using the power series expansion of $e^x$, one immediately sees that the average height is greater than the slope of the secant line. Alternatively, one can answer the question by using the first and second derivatives of $x(1+e^x)-2(e^x-1)$.
Yet, answers like these seem too hacky. A more elegant one is to compare the derivatives of $\frac x2$ and $\tanh\frac x2=\frac{e^x-1}{e^x+1}$, but I don't expect a high school student to be aware of the use of hyperbolic tangent.
Since both $\frac{1+e^x}2$ and $\frac{e^x-1}x$ have geometric interpretations, I wonder if there is a more natural --- and probably geometrically minded --- answer. Any idea?
You might be interested in the strict formulation of the Hermite–Hadamard inequality—if $f$ is strictly convex on $[a,b]$ where $a<b$, then the integral of $f$ is strictly bounded above by its trapezoidal approximation: $$\int_a^bf(x)\mathrm{d}x< \tfrac{f(a)+f(b)}{2}(b-a)\text{.}$$ Set $a=0$, $b=x$, $f(x)=\mathrm{e}^x$. Then $$\mathrm{e}^x-1< x\left(\tfrac{\mathrm{e}^x+1}{2}\right)\text{.}$$ Since $f$ in this case is positive and smooth, it's pretty easy to illustrate the inequality graphically.