Inverse image of sum of ideals

151 Views Asked by At

Lately, I've been looking for nice identities involving ring homomorphisms and ideals. For example, I've been able to prove that for an epimorphism $\varphi:R\to S$ and two ideals $I,J\subset R$ we have $\varphi(I+J)=\varphi(I)+\varphi(J)$; or that for a principal ideal $(a)$, $a\in R$, we have $\varphi( (a) )=(\varphi(a))$.

Now I'm wondering what would happen to two ideals $I',J'\subset S$, using $\varphi^{-1}$. When does it hold that $\varphi^{-1}(I'+J')=\varphi^{-1}(I')+\varphi^{-1}(J')$? I got one contention:

If $r\in\varphi^{-1}(I')+\varphi^{-1}(J')$ then $\exists\, i\in\varphi^{-1}(I'),j\in\varphi^{-1}(J'):r=i+j\Rightarrow\varphi(r)=\varphi(i)+\varphi(j)\in I'+J'\Rightarrow r\in\varphi^{-1}(I'+J')$

For the other contention I first got stuck at

If $r\in\varphi^{-1}(I'+J')$ then $\varphi(r)=i'+j',i'\in I', j'\in J'$

where I have to assume $\varphi$ is surjective to say $\exists\, i,j: \varphi(i)=i',\varphi(j)=j'$.

But then I got

$\varphi(r)=\varphi(i+j)$

and I'd say I need to conclude $r=i+j$, but for that I'd need $\varphi$ to be injective (hence an isomorphism).

Is it really necessary to assume $\varphi$ is an isomorphism? I found a counterexample where $\varphi$ is injective, but nor surjective, so I'd say we need surjectivity; but I'm not able to find a counterexample where $\varphi$ is surjective, but not injective.

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

For a counter example in which $\phi$ is injective but not surjective, consider:

  • $S=R\oplus R$,

  • $\phi(x) =(x,x)$,

  • $I= R\oplus 0$, and

  • $J=0\oplus R$.

When $\phi$ is surjective the missing inclusion may be proved as follows: write $\phi(r)=i'+j'$ and pick $s$ in $R$ such that $\phi(s)=i'$. Then $$ \phi(r-s) = j'$$ whence $r-s\in \phi^{-1}(J')$ and clearly $s\in \phi^{-1}(I').$

We then have $$ r= s +(r-s) \in \phi^{-1}(I')+\phi^{-1}(J'). $$