Inverse limit of sequence of fibrations

413 Views Asked by At

I'm reading through the proof of Proposition 4.67 in Hatcher's Algebraic Topology, and I've come to something that I'm having trouble understanding.

For an arbitrary sequence of fibrations $... \rightarrow\ X_2 \rightarrow\ X_1$, I need to show that the natural map $\lambda: \pi_i(\varprojlim X_n) \rightarrow\ \varprojlim \pi_i(X_n)$ is injective if the maps $\pi_{i+1}(X_n) \rightarrow\ \pi_{i+1}(X_{n-1})$ are surjective for all $n$.

If $f: S^i \rightarrow\ \varprojlim X_n$ is in $Ker \lambda$, then each component map $f_n: S^i \rightarrow\ X_n$ is nullhomotopic. So for each $n$, there exists $F_n: D^{i+1} \rightarrow\ X_n$ such that $F_n$ restricted to $S^i$ is $f_n$. If $F_n$ can be homotoped so that $F_{n-1} = p_nF_{n}$, where $p_n: X_n \rightarrow\ X_{n-1}$ is from the sequence of fibrations, then induction on $n$ yields the result.

From the definition of the inverse limit, $F_{n-1} = p_nF_{n}$ on $S^i$, so by gluing the two disks $p_nF_n: D^{i+1} \rightarrow\ X_{n-1}$ and $F_{n-1}: D^{i+1} \rightarrow\ X_{n-1}$ together along $S^i$, it is possible to construct a map $g_{n-1}: S^{n+1} \rightarrow\ X_{n-1}$.

According to Hatcher, the surjectivity of $\pi_{i+1}(X_n) \rightarrow\ \pi_{i+1}(X_{n-1})$ implies that there exists $G_n: D^{i+1} \rightarrow\ X^n$ such that $G^n$ restricted to $S^i$ is $f_n$ and $p_nG_n$ is homotopic rel $S^i$ to $F_{n-1}$.

Why is this true? If $\pi_{i+1}(X_n) \rightarrow\ \pi_{i+1}(X_{n-1})$, then there exists $g_{n}: S^{i+1} \rightarrow\ X_{n}$ such that $p_ng_n$ is homotopic to $g_{n-1}$, but I see no way to get the desired $G_n$ from $g_n$. Any help would be most appreciated.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

1
On BEST ANSWER

To be honest, I have trouble finding out what is the needed argument, but I'll try to give another one. I will consistently use radial coordinates on the disk, ie. $(r, \phi) \in D^{k}$, where $r$ is the distance from the centre and $\phi \in S^{k-1}$.

Let $\tilde{F}_{n-1}: S^{i} \times I \rightarrow X_{n-1}$ given by $\tilde{F}_{n-1}(\phi, t) = F_{n-1}(t-1, \phi)$ be the contracting homotopy. By the fibration property there exists a lift of this homotopy to $X_{n}$, say $G_{n}$, such that $G_{n} |_{S^{i} \times \{ 0 \}} = f_{n}$.

Let $g_{n} = G_{n} |_{S^{i} \times \{ 1 \}}$. Since $\tilde{F}_{n-1} |_{S^{i} \times \{ 1 \}}$ maps to the basepoint, we see that the image of $g_{n}$ is contained in the fibre $F \subseteq X_{n}$. The map $\pi_{i+1}(X_{n}) \rightarrow \pi_{i+1}(X_{n-1})$ is surjective and hence by the long exact sequence of homotopy the map $\pi_{i}(F) \rightarrow \pi_{i}(X_{n})$ is injective. Since $g_{n}$ is null in $\pi_{i}(X_{n})$ (being homotopic to $f_{n}$), it must be also null in $F$ and thus there is a contracting homotopy $H_{n}: S^{i} \times I \rightarrow F$.

Now define a map $F ^\prime _{n}: D^{i+1} \rightarrow X_{n}$ by

$F ^\prime _{n}(r, \phi) = G_{n}(\phi, 2(1-r))$ for $r \geq \frac{1}{2}$

$F ^\prime _{n}(r, \phi) = H_{n}(\phi, 2(\frac{1}{2}-r))$ for $r \leq \frac{1}{2}$,

After a moment of thought, we see that $p_{n} F^\prime _{n}$ is homotopic to $F_{n-1}$. Using the homotopy lifting for $(D^{i+1}, S^{i})$ we may deform it $rel \ S^{i}$ to a map $F_{n}$ such that $p_{n} F_{n} = F_{n-1}$, which is what we wanted to do.