If we have complex reductive Lie algebra L and her finite dimensional representation $\phi$. How can we show that $\phi$ is irreducible iff restriction $\phi|_{[L,L]}$ is irreducible?
2026-05-05 17:43:37.1778003017
Irreducible representation and reductive Lie algebra
841 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $\phi|_{[L,L]}$ is irreducible, it's immediate that $\phi$ is irreducible (because any invariant subspace for whole $L$ would be also invariant for $[L,L] \subseteq L$).
Conversly, suppose $\phi \colon L \to \mathfrak{gl}(V)$ is irreducible, V finite-dimensional. It can be shown that every reductive Lie algebra is direct sum of it's two ideals: $L=Z(L) \dot{+} [L,L]$, where Z(L) is center of L (hence commutative), and [L,L] is semisimple.
First we show that any element $x \in Z(L)$ acts on $V$ by scalar, i.e. there is $\lambda(x) \in \mathbb C$ such that $\phi(x) v=\lambda(x) \cdot v$. To see this, note that for any $y \in L$ we have $[x,y]=0$, so $\phi(x)\circ\phi(y)=\phi(y)\circ\phi(x)$. From this, we can see that endomorphism $\phi(x) \colon V \to V$ respects $L$-action on V: $$ \phi(x) (y.v)= \phi(x) (\phi(y) v) = \phi(y) (\phi(x) v) = y. (\phi(x) v), \quad y \in L, \ v \in V, $$ and Schur's lemma does the rest. We get a linear functional $\lambda \colon Z(L) \to \mathbb C$, such that $$ \phi(x+y)v = \lambda(x)\cdot v + \phi(y)v, \quad x \in Z(L), \ y \in [L,L], \ v \in V. $$
From this we see that a subspace $W \leq V$ is invariant for all $L=Z(L) \dot{+} [L,L]$ if and only if it is invariant for all $[L,L]$, and this proves your claim.