Is $a\sim b$ exactly when $a \times b$ is divisible by $3$ an equivalence relation?

1.5k Views Asked by At

Let $\sim$ be define so that $a\sim b$ exactly when $a \times b$ is divisible by $3$. Is this an equivalence relation? If not, which of the three properties (reflexive, symmetric, transitive) does not hold?

Solution:

We need to test each of the following cases to see if they hold.

Here are my assumptions: $a\times b$ is divisible by $3$ in the following cases:

  • Case 1: $3\mid a $, and $3\nmid b$. Example: $a=3, b=2, a\times b=6$
  • Case 2: $3\nmid {a}$, and $3\mid b$. Example: $a=2, b=3, a\times b=6$
  • Case 3: $3\mid a$, and $3\mid b$. Example: $a=3, b=3, a\times b=9$

Reflexive Test:

  • $aRa: = \{(a,a): 3\mid a\times a\}$
  • $bRb: = \{(b,b): 3\mid b\times b\}$

This fails in $aRa$ when $a$ is not divisible by $3$ according to case 1. This also fails in $bRb$ when $b$ is not divisible by $3$ according to case 2.

Symmetric Test:

  • $aRb: = \{(a,b): 3\mid a\times b\}$
  • $bRa: = \{(b,a): 3\mid b\times a\}$

This works because if $a\times b$ is divisible by $3$, then $a$ is divisible by $a\times b$ and $b$ is divisible by $b\times a$.

Transitive Test: Honestly I am not exactly sure how to describe the relation here, since we need $a$, $b$ and $c$.

What is $c$ in this case, is it the result of $a\times b$?

Am I on the right track?

3

There are 3 best solutions below

2
On BEST ANSWER

I think you're making things more complicated by using notation, rather than thinking about what the question means.

Reflexivity. Is it the case that, for every number $a$, $a^2$ is divisible by $3$? If yes, then the relation is reflexive. If no, then the relation is not reflexive.

Symmetry. Is it the case that, if $ab$ is divisible by $3$, then $ba$ is divisible by $3$? If yes, then the relation is symmetric. If no, then the relation is not symmetric.

Transitivity. Is it the case that, if $ab$ is divisible by $3$ and $bc$ is divisible by $3$, then $ac$ is divisible by $3$? If yes, then the relation is transitive. If no, then the relation is not transitive.

Do you see the answers to these questions?


Note that these questions are just translations, into words, of the usual formal definition. E.g., $R$ is reflexive iff for every $a$, we have $aRa$. In this case, "$xRy$" means "$xy$ is divisible by $3$," so the question "Is $R$ reflexive?" is the same as the question "Is it the case that, for every $a$, $a^2$ is divisible by $3$?"

0
On

$3$ is prime, so $a\sim b \iff 3|ab \iff 3|a \text{ or } 3|b$.

$\sim$ is not transitive: $1\sim 3$ and $3\sim 1$, but not $1\sim 1$.

As just seen, $\sim$ is not reflexive.

It is symmetric, obviously.

2
On

It is not transitive! Take $3|(2\times 3),~~3|(3\times 4)$ but $3$ does not divide $2\times 4$.