According to the definition of an Anti-Symmetric Relation if xRy and yRx then x = y
Which means, effectively, x is in relation with itself. Does this mean that anti-symmetry implies reflexive property as well?
According to the definition of an Anti-Symmetric Relation if xRy and yRx then x = y
Which means, effectively, x is in relation with itself. Does this mean that anti-symmetry implies reflexive property as well?
On
Not really. For example the empty relation is anti-symmetric, but is not reflexive unless the underlying set is empty as well.
I hope this helps $\ddot\smile$.
On
A relation that is antisymmetric but not reflexive is said to be "strongly antisymmetric" or "asymmetric".
This implies : $$(xRy) \implies (\neg(yRx))$$
As if $(xRy)$ and $(yRx)$, then $x=y$ but $x\not R x$ because $R$ is not reflexive (which mean you actually can't apply antisymetry to deduce equality).
$>$ and $<$ are the most common examples.
Your definition is wrong. The relation $R$ is antisymmetric if, whenever $x\mathrel{R}y$ and $y\mathrel R x$ it holds that $x=y$.
An example of a relation that is antisymmetric but not reflexive is $>$ on the set of integers.