We only chose the decimal system because we have 10 fingers. Binary is the most basic positional numbering system, so would it make sense to say that it would be the most ideal system? Is it better than hexadecimal, base-12 base-10 and base-8 since those seem arbitrary? Would it be considered the most "wholesome" positional system?
2026-03-27 07:57:11.1774598231
Is binary more ideal than decimal?
1.6k Views Asked by user88528 https://math.techqa.club/user/user88528/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in BINARY
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- Produce solutions such that $k$&$x$ $=$ $k$,in a range ($0$,$n$)
- Solve an equation with binary rotation and xor
- Number of binary sequences with no consecutive ones.
- Recurrence with $\lfloor n/2 \rfloor$
- Converting numbers to different bases
- Why does the decimal representation of (10^x * 10^y) always suffix the same representation in binary?
- Period of a binary sequence
- Contradiction in simple linear regression formula
- From unary to binary numeral system
Related Questions in NUMBER-SYSTEMS
- Why do we can't replace binary numbers with decimal like we do in hexadecimal and octal?
- How many numerals (unique glyphs) do we use to note a number in a non-integer base numeral system?
- How to convert from base 4 to base 16?
- Find possible bases of an operation
- What is the logic behind the octal to decimal conversion using the expansion method?
- Why the hexadecimal numbers can be converted directly into binary numbers so cleanly?
- Base 17 on a Suanpan (Chinese abacus)
- How to Prove Square Number?
- Multiplication of two number in 2's complement
- We know that $2^0$=1 but why $(-2)^0$=not 1
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Mathematically, possibly the most "pure" numbering system is the system consisting of zero and the successor function $S$. In this system, instead of writing the first several non-negative integers as $0, 1,2,3,4,5,6$ and so forth, we write
$$ 0,$$ $$ S(0),$$ $$ S(S(0)),$$ $$ S(S(S(0))),$$ $$ S(S(S(S(0)))),$$ $$ S(S(S(S(S(0))))),$$ and so forth. It's cumbersome, but it is related very closely to the fundamental concepts of arithmetic; at least, it is much closer to the fundamentals than binary is, in my opinion.
As a practical matter, most digital electronic computers use binary arithmetic for most internal calculations. That's because "on" and "off" are relatively simple concepts to get modern electronics to keep track of accurately. There were attempts to use more than two possible voltage levels as "digits" inside computers, which would have allowed computers to do their internal calculations truly in a base higher than two, but these efforts were not successful enough. I think there may still be some computers (or at least electronic hand calculators) that still use binary-coded decimal, which means they're basically working in base ten but some of the details (such as determining that $2 + 3 = 5$) are worked out in binary. The only reason I can see for this is to accommodate the fact that the humans using these computers want to see base-ten numbers going in and base-ten numbers coming out. (The humans may also particularly want to see "rounding" done in a base-ten fashion for some applications.)
As someone who works professionally with computers and occasionally has to deal with binary numeric representations directly, I find that as the numbers get larger in size it becomes very difficult to work directly with the binary representation, simply because the numbers have too many digits to keep track of (and certainly far more digits than I care to have to copy). Octal and hexadecimal are much more convenient. If we ever give up on decimal notation, I think it's much more likely that human society will switch to octal or hexadecimal for most numbers than that we will every make binary our usual numbering system.
Regardless of the numbering system, each number is what it is, and most mathematical properties (other than obvious ones such as number of digits or having the digit $6$) are not affected. For example, a number that is prime when written in base ten is a prime number in any system of writing the integers.