I have a question,Is cracking MD5 hash a form of P VS NP problem?
2026-04-01 15:05:45.1775055945
Is cracking MD5 hash a form of P VS NP problem?
437 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPUTATIONAL-COMPLEXITY
- Product of sums of all subsets mod $k$?
- Proving big theta notation?
- Little oh notation
- proving sigma = BigTheta (BigΘ)
- sources about SVD complexity
- Is all Linear Programming (LP) problems solvable in Polynomial time?
- growth rate of $f(x)= x^{1/7}$
- Unclear Passage in Cook's Proof of SAT NP-Completeness: Why The Machine M Should Be Modified?
- Minimum Matching on the Minimum Triangulation
- How to find the average case complexity of Stable marriage problem(Gale Shapley)?
Related Questions in CRYPTOGRAPHY
- What exactly is the definition of Carmichael numbers?
- What if Eve knows the value of $S$ in digital signiture?
- Relative prime message in RSA encryption.
- Encryption with $|K| = |P| = |C| = 1$ is perfectly secure?
- Cryptocurrency Math
- DLP Relationship of primitive roots $\pmod{p}$ with $p$ and $g$
- Hints to prove $2^{(p−1)/2}$ is congruent to 1 (mod p) or p-1 (mod p)
- Period of a binary sequence
- generating function / stream cipher
- RSA, cryptography
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No, because finding a preimage of a MD5 hash (which I assume is what you mean by "cracking" it) is a problem with a fixed, unchangeable input size, namely 128 bits.
P versus NP is about how well the best possible algorithm for a problem scales when the size of the input goes towards infinity. A problem with a limited input size does not allow that question to be asked at all.
Knowing that P$\ne$NP would tell us nothing about how fast an algorithm for finding MD5 preimages would be.
Knowing that P$=$NP wouldn't really tell us anything. It would imply that there's a polynomial-time algorithm that takes a description of a hash function (assuming the forward algorithm for the hash is not uselessly slow) and a hash, and produces a preimage. But it would not tell anything about the degree of that polynomial, or how large its constant factors are. So the polynomial algorithm might still not be practically feasible in the "128 bits" case.