I've been trying to use Gosper's continued fraction algorithms to work backwards from some randomly chosen pairs of rational numbers but it seems impossible to get arbitrary pairs to be consecutive convergents of a single continued fraction, particularly if they don't have the same integer part. Is there some way of determining which pairs do and which do not have this property?
2026-03-25 17:41:57.1774460517
Is every pair of rational numbers a pair of consecutive convergents of some continued fraction?
132 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CONTINUED-FRACTIONS
- Formula for the simple reapeted infinitely continued fractions
- Infinite continued fractions and convergents
- Convergence of $\ln\frac{x}{\ln\frac{x}{\ln x...}}$
- Find $\frac{a}{b} \in \mathbb{Q}$ such that $ |\,\frac{a}{b} - \sqrt{2}|_3 < \epsilon $
- $\sqrt{\frac{\pi e}{2}}=\frac{1}{1+\mathrm{K}_{i=1}^{\infty}{\frac{i}{1}}}+\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{\frac{1}{(2n+1)!!}}$ implies $\sqrt{\pi e/2}\notin Q$?
- is there an algorithm that generates the continued fraction of a product of convergent continued fractions?
- continued fraction of $\sqrt{41}$
- Fundamental solution to specific Pell equation
- Continued fraction of binomial function $(1+z)^{1/4}$
- How does the convergence sector of a continued fraction depend on the order where it is truncated?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It might help to think about Rationals geometrically? If you have a fraction $\frac{a}{b}$ and you were to plot $a$ on the y-axis of a chart, and b on the x-axis, then because the $a$'s & $b$'s are integers, you create an integer lattice of points on which the Rational could "land" on.
So if you were to take a pair of Rationals, the shortest possible distance between them would be 1 horizonally or vertically, creating a square of unit side. Now, the Determinant of a 2x2 matrix (here, our two fractions) can be considered the area of a parallelogram p.133, Proofs without Words, or this "square". That is, when the $|Det|=1$ we have neighbouring Rationals.
You can probably see where this is leading us from the diagram in the link? - the Mediant, which is another way of computing CFs.
Take (any) two Rationals $\frac{a}{b}$, $\frac{c}{d}$ and compute their Mediant $m=\frac{(a+c)}{b+d}$ and you get the next Convergent of a CF, geometrically shown in the link as the "addition" of two squares.
You can continue in this way until the CF terminates (when $|Det|=1$), or not! (infinite CF). Cook has a nice example of using the Mediant in this way.
There are many references in the literature on Best Rational Approximations, and every book on CF's explains this (Determinant concept) mathematically, much better than I! A really nice "easy" explanation of this is in p.184, Strange Curves, Counting Rabbits. I apologise for the non-mathematical explanation, but I've certainly tried to give an intuitive explanation to your question, and I hope this helps.