Let $P$ be a smooth principal bundle on a manifold $M$ with a structure Lie group $G$. Then we define the gauge group $\mathcal{G}$ by the automorphism group of $P$, that is, the group of diffeomorphisms on $P$ which preserve the fiber and the action of $G$. This pdf says that the gauge group is a Hilbert Lie group. Is it true? And what is its Lie algebra?
2026-03-25 14:32:25.1774449145
Is gauge group infinite dimensional Lie group?
144 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in PRINCIPAL-BUNDLES
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Prove that a "tensor product" principal $G$-bundle coincides with a "pullback" via topos morphism
- Holonomy group and irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$-connections
- Killing field associate to an element in the Lie Algebra
- Different definitions of irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ connections
- Proving that a form is horizontal in the Chern Weil method proof
- References for endomorphism bundle and adjoint bundle
- References: Equivalence between local systems and vector bundles (with flat connections)
Related Questions in GAUGE-THEORY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Holonomy group and irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$-connections
- Holonomy group is closed or not?
- Different definitions of irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ connections
- Yang–Mills theory and mass gap
- Dimension of the Marsden-Weinstein reduction of a coadjoint orbit in the dual of the Lie algebra of the gauge group (Atiyah-Bott context)
- Connections on Bundles with Trivial Determinant
- Dimension of the space of harmonic $\mathrm{Ad}P$-valued differential 1-forms on a surface
- Vector-valued forms inside the first jet bundle
- Is the determinant of the holonomy gauge invariant / significant?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
the reason why a gauge field is in the Lie algebra of a gauge group $G$ is that we have to cancel out the term which comes from the kinetic term by acting gauge transformation. For simplification I want to use the $F_{\mu \nu}$. I know this transforms as $$ F_{\mu \nu} \rightarrow g F_{\mu \nu} g^{-1} $$ and it's called adjoint representation $(g \in G)$. The field strength $F_{\mu \nu}$ is a (local representation of) a Lie-algebra valued two-form. In components, it is often written as $F_{\mu \nu}^a$, where the $\mu \nu$ are the space-time indices (making it a two-form) and a is the Lie-algebra index. As such, it is indeed in the Lie-algebra.
However, it is not any Lie-algebra valued two form. Instead, it is the (local representation of) the covariant derivative of a special one-form, the connection one-form (whose local representation is usually denoted by $A_\mu$ ). This necessarily transforms in the adjoint representation. An intuitive reasoning for this can be found in this question (1). This is the mathematical viewpoint. The physical viewpoint is that the adjoint rep gives the "correct" transformation, simply because of the way we have defined the field strength in nonabelian gauge theories. Specifically, the field strength is defined as (this definition comes from the differential geometry picture sketched above): $$ F_{\mu \nu}=\partial_\mu A_\nu-\partial_\nu A_\mu-i\left[A_\nu, A_\mu\right] $$
And if you perform a gauge transformation of this object (as is done e.g. here (2), you find that it transforms in the adjoint representation.