I asked a similar question previously at Is it true that any 3-regular graph containing K_{3,2} as subgraph must be non-planar? The requirement can be relaxed so that the $K_{3,2}$ "locally" respect the bipartite structure, namely there can't be edge connecting two vertices on the dangling side. Many thanks in advance.
2026-03-29 12:12:02.1774786322
Is it true that any 3-regular bipartite graph containing $K_{3,2}$ as subgraph must be non-planar?
422 Views Asked by user693282 https://math.techqa.club/user/user693282/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in PLANAR-GRAPHS
- max planarity and triangulation
- How to find a minimal planar covering of a graph
- Complete bipartite planar graphs
- Is graph Planar?
- Kuratowski's theorem on Planar graphs
- Graph Theory: Degree of regions in a planar graph
- On the Hex/Nash connection game theorem
- Graph Theory: There is only one planar graph with all vertices of degree 4 and 10 regions
- Intersection of circles and regions
- Which of these graphs is planar?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes, it is true.
Combinatorially speaking, there is only one plane embedding of $K_{3,2}$: the one shown below.
To complete this graph to a $3$-regular bipartite graph, there must be at least one more vertex in the component containing copy of $K_{3,2}$. That vertex must be in the interior of one of the length-$4$ faces of this plane embedding. It doesn't matter which one, but let's put it in the interior of the face with corners $v_1, w_1, v_2, w_2$.
That vertex must be part of a fragment which is bipartite and nearly $3$-regular, except for an edge to one or both of $v_1, v_2$. Crucially, since $v_1$ and $v_2$ are in the same part of the bipartition, the edges to $v_1$ and/or $v_2$ must also come from the same side of the bipartition of the fragment.
But now, suppose that the fragment has $k$ vertices in one part and $\ell$ vertices in the other part (with the edges to $v_1$ and/or $v_2$ coming from the part of size $\ell$). Then there are $3k$ edges from the first part to the second, but either $3\ell-1$ or $3\ell-2$ edges from the second part to the first. This is a contradiction, so no bipartite $3$-regular planar graph can contain a $K_{3,2}$.
However, if we relax the condition "bipartite" to "triangle-free", then there are many counterexamples. Take your favorite bipartite, planar, $3$-regular graph $G$; delete an edge $u_1 u_2$ on the exterior boundary of a plane embedding of $G$, and splice it into the embedding above by adding edges $u_1v_1$ and $u_2v_2$ instead. (The result is no longer bipartite, because $u_1$ and $u_2$ were in different parts of the bipartition of $G$.)
We now have a planar triangle-free graph which is $3$-regular except for $v_3$. Take two copies of this graph and join them by an edge connecting $v_3$ and its copy, and we get a planar $3$-regular triangle-free graph that contains a copy of $K_{3,2}$.