Is my generalization of Theorem 4.14 in Brezis's Functional Analysis correct?

44 Views Asked by At

I'm reading Brezis's Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, and trying to generalize Theorem 4.14 from $\mathbb R$ to a Hilbert space $H$. Let $(X, \Sigma, \mu)$ be a $\sigma$-finite complete measure space. Let $(H, \langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle_H)$ be a Hilbert space (over the field $\mathbb R$) and $|\cdot|$ its induced norm.

Theorem: Let $\phi \in (L_1)^*$. There exists a unique $u \in L_\infty$ such that $$ \langle \phi, f \rangle = \int \langle u, f \rangle_H \quad \forall f \in L_1. $$ Moreover, $\|u\|_\infty = \|\phi\|_{(L_1)^*}$.

Could you have a check on my attempt?


My attempt: By $\sigma$-finiteness, there is an increasing (w.r.t. inclusion) sequence $(X_n) \subset \mathcal A$ such that $\mu (X_n) < \infty$ and $\bigcup_n X_n =X$.

  1. Uniqueness.

Assume $u, u' \in L_\infty$ such that $$ \langle \phi, f \rangle = \int \langle u, f \rangle_H = \int \langle u', f \rangle_H \quad \forall f \in L_1. $$

Then $$ \int \langle u-u', f \rangle_H = 0 \quad \forall f \in L_1. $$

We pick $f_0 = (u-u')1_{X_n}$. Because $u-u'$ is essentially bounded on $X_n$ and $\mu (X_n) < \infty$, we get $f_0 \in L_1$. So $$ \int \langle u-u', f_0 \rangle_H = 0 \iff \int |(u-u')1_{X_n}|^2 = 0. $$

It follows that $u=u'$ $\mu$-a.e. on $X_n$. Hence $u=u'$ $\mu$-a.e.

  1. Existence.

There exist a sequence $(\varepsilon_n) \subset \mathbb R_{>0}$ and a map $\theta \in L_2 (X, \mu, \mathbb R)$ such that $\theta (x) = \varepsilon_n$ for all $x \in X_n$. By Hölder inequality, $\theta f \in L_1$ for all $f \in L_2$. The map $L_2 \to \mathbb R, f \mapsto \langle \phi, \theta f\rangle$ is linear continuous. By this result, we have $(L_2)^* = L_2$. So there is $v \in L_2$ such that $$ \langle \phi, \theta f\rangle = \int \langle v, f \rangle_H \quad \forall f \in L_2. $$

Let $u := v /\theta$. Then $u$ is $\mu$-measurable. For all $g \in L_\infty$, we have

  • $\frac{g1_{X_n}}{\theta} \in L_2$. This is because $\theta$ is constant on $X_n$, $g$ is essentially bounded on $X_n$, and $\mu(X_n) < \infty$.
  • $g1_{X_n} \in L_1$. This is because $g$ is essentially bounded on $X_n$ and $\mu(X_n) < \infty$.

Hence for all $g \in L_\infty$ and $n \in \mathbb N$, we have $$ \langle \phi, g1_{X_n} \rangle = \left \langle \phi, \theta \left ( \frac{g1_{X_n}}{\theta} \right )\right \rangle = \int \left \langle v, \frac{g1_{X_n}}{\theta} \right \rangle_H = \int \left \langle \frac{v}{\theta}, g1_{X_n} \right \rangle_H = \int \langle u, g1_{X_n} \rangle_H. $$

Next we prove that $\|u\|_\infty \le \|\phi\|_{(L_1)^*}$. Fix any $C> \|\phi\|_{(L_1)^*}$ and let $A := \{x \in X | C < |u(x)|\} \in \mathcal A$. Notice that $u > 0$ on $A$. Let $g_0 := 1_{A} \frac{u}{|u|} \in L_\infty$. Then

  • $$ |\langle \phi, g_0 1_{X_n} \rangle| \le \|\phi\|_{(L_1)^*} \| g_0 1_{X_n}\|_1 = \|\phi\|_{(L_1)^*} \left \| \frac{u}{|u|} 1_{A\cap X_n} \right \|_1 = \|\phi\|_{(L_1)^*} \mu (A \cap X_n). $$
  • $$ \int \langle u, g_0 1_{X_n} \rangle_H = \int \left \langle u, \frac{u}{|u|}1_{A \cap X_n} \right \rangle_H = \int |u|1_{A \cap X_n} \ge C \mu (A \cap X_n). $$

It follows that $$ C \mu (A \cap X_n) \le \|\phi\|_{(L_1)^*} \mu (A \cap X_n). $$

Hence $\mu (A \cap X_n) = 0$ and thus $\mu (A) = \lim_n \mu (A \cap X_n) = 0$. So $A$ is a $\mu$-null set. We claim that $$ \langle \phi, h\rangle = \int \langle u, h\rangle_H \quad \forall h \in L_1. $$

Let $T_n$ be the truncation operator, i.e., $(T_n h) (x) = h (x)$ if $|h (x)| \le n$ and $(T_n h) (x) = n h(x)/ |h(x)|$ otherwise. Then $(T_n h)1_{X_n} \to h$ in $L_1$ by dominated convergence theorem. On the other hand, $T_n h \le n$ and thus $T_n h \in L_\infty$. As such, $$ \langle \phi, (T_nh)1_{X_n}\rangle = \int \langle u, (T_nh)1_{X_n} \rangle_H. $$

Notice that the map $L_1 \to \mathbb R, h \mapsto \int \langle u, h \rangle$ is linear continuous. Hence $$ \langle \phi, h \rangle = \lim_n \langle \phi, (T_nh)1_{X_n}\rangle = \lim_n \int \langle u, (T_nh)1_{X_n} \rangle_H = \int \left \langle u, \lim_n (T_nh)1_{X_n} \right \rangle_H = \int \langle u, h \rangle_H. $$

Finally, we have $$ |\langle \phi, h \rangle| \le \int |u| |h| \le \|u\|_\infty \int |h| = \|u\|_\infty \|h\|_1. $$

Hence $\|\phi\|_{(L_1)^*} \le \|u\|_\infty$. This completes the proof.