Is it true that $\operatorname{tr}|A|=\operatorname{tr}|A^\dagger|$ for any operator in a Hilbert space? I can prove this statement for normal operators such that $[A,A^\dagger]=0$. I want to know is there any proof or counter example for general case?
2026-03-28 06:40:22.1774680022
Is $\operatorname{tr}|A|=\operatorname{tr}|A^\dagger|$?
78 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in HILBERT-SPACES
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- hyponormal operators
- a positive matrix of operators
- If $S=(S_1,S_2)$ hyponormal, why $S_1$ and $S_2$ are hyponormal?
- Is the cartesian product of two Hilbert spaces a Hilbert space?
- Show that $ Tf $ is continuous and measurable on a Hilbert space $H=L_2((0,\infty))$
- Kernel functions for vectors in discrete spaces
- The space $D(A^\infty)$
- Show that $Tf$ is well-defined and is continious
- construction of a sequence in a complex Hilbert space which fulfills some specific properties
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Note: Any references to theorems etc. I will make in the following are with respect to the book "Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. I: Functional Analysis" by Reed & Simon (1980).
If your Hilbert space $\mathcal H$ is separable and $A\in\mathcal B(\mathcal H)$, i.e. $A$ is a bounded operator on $\mathcal H$, your assertion is indeed true for the following reason. As you might know, on separable Hilbert spaces one defines the trace class to be $$ \mathcal B^1(\mathcal H):=\lbrace A\in\mathcal B(\mathcal H)\,|\,\operatorname{tr}(\sqrt{A^\dagger A})<\infty\rbrace\,. $$ Here one uses that on positive semi-definite operators, the trace is well-defined (independent of the chosen orthonormal basis), linear and takes values in $[0,\infty]$. Now if $A\in\mathcal B^1(\mathcal H)$ then $A$ is compact (Theorem VI.21) which is equivalent to admitting a singular value decomposition $$ A=\sum_{n\in\mathbb N}\sigma_n(A)\langle \psi_n,\cdot\rangle\phi_n\tag{1} $$ with unique non-negative numbers $(\sigma_n(A))_{n\in\mathbb N}$ and orthonormal systems $(\psi_n)_{n\in\mathbb N}$, $(\phi_n)_{n\in\mathbb N}$ in $\mathcal H$ where the sum converges in the operator norm (Theorem VI.17). Due to the above singular value decompoition, it is evident that every compact operator $A$ on $\mathcal H$ satisfies $$ \operatorname{tr}(\sqrt{A^\dagger A})=\sum_{n\in\mathbb N}\sigma_n(A)\,,\tag{2} $$ where the right-hand side (and thus both sides) might take the value $\infty$. This is enough preparation to prove the statement in question.
Proof. We may assume that at either $\operatorname{tr}(\sqrt{A^\dagger A})$ or $\operatorname{tr}(\sqrt{A A^\dagger})$ (or both) are finite - otherwise we would obviously be done due to $\operatorname{tr}(\sqrt{A^\dagger A})=\infty=\operatorname{tr}(\sqrt{A A^\dagger})$. W.l.o.g. $\operatorname{tr}(\sqrt{A^\dagger A})<\infty$ so $A\in\mathcal B^1(\mathcal H)$ and $\operatorname{tr}(\sqrt{A^\dagger A})=\sum_{n\in\mathbb N}\sigma_n(A)$. By (1), obviously $A^\dagger$ is compact as well with $\sigma_n(A^\dagger)=(\sigma_n(A))^*=\sigma_n(A)$ and thus $$ \operatorname{tr}(\sqrt{A^\dagger A})=\sum_{n\in\mathbb N}\sigma_n(A)=\sum_{n\in\mathbb N}\sigma_n(A^\dagger)=\operatorname{tr}(\sqrt{A A^\dagger})<\infty $$ which concludes the proof. $\quad\square$