Are there any theorems that can only be proved by induction? Induction seems to be proof by technicality.
2026-05-05 10:43:42.1777977822
Is Proof By Induction Necessary?
471 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in INDUCTION
- Show that the sequence is bounded below 3
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
- Prove $\sum^{n}_{i=1}\binom{n}{i}i=n2^{n-1}$ using binomial and induction
- Induction proof of Fibonacci numbers
- The Martian Monetary System
- How to format a proof by induction
- $x+\frac{1}{x}$ is an integer
- Help with induction proof please! For an integer $n, 3$ divides $n^3-n$
- Proving $\sum_{k=1}^n kk!=(n+1)!−1$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
What set of axioms are you using? If you use the Peano Axioms, you can't prove much without induction. In particular, the commutative and associative properties of addition and multiplication require induction. The inverted addition proof that you mention needs a lot of work to justify if you go all the way back to the axioms. If we don't go back to the axioms we rely on a lot of intuitive understanding of the naturals.