Let $\pi\colon X\to Y$ be a covering map. Is $\pi_*$ an exact functor of abelian sheaves? It's straightforward to show that this is true if $\pi$ is a finite cover, so I'm going to assume that $\pi$ is infinite.
2026-03-28 05:21:48.1774675308
Is sheaf direct image exact for covering maps?
178 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-TOPOLOGY
- How to compute homology group of $S^1 \times S^n$
- the degree of a map from $S^2$ to $S^2$
- Show $f$ and $g$ are both homeomorphism mapping of $T^2$ but $f$ is not homotopy equivalent with $g.$
- Chain homotopy on linear chains: confusion from Hatcher's book
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- CW-structure on $S^n$ and orientations
Related Questions in SHEAF-THEORY
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- Question about notation for Čech cohomology and direct image of sheaves in Hartshorne
- Does sheafification preserve surjectivity?
- Image of a morphism of chain complexes of sheaves via direct/inverse image functor
- Tensor of a $k[X]$ module with the structure sheaf of an affine variety is a sheaf
- Sheafy definition for the tangent space at a point on a manifold?
- Whats the relationship between a presheaf and its sheafification?
- First isomorphism theorem of sheaves -- do you need to sheafify if the map is surjective on basis sets?
- An irreducible topological space $X$ admits a constant sheaf iff it is indiscrete.
- Why does a globally generated invertible sheaf admit a global section not vanishing on any irreducible component?
Related Questions in COVERING-SPACES
- Definition of regular covering maps: independent of choice of point
- Universal cover $\mathbb{S}^3 \rightarrow SO(3)$ through Quaternions.
- How to find a minimal planar covering of a graph
- Questions from Forster's proof regarding unbranched holomorphic proper covering map
- $\mathbb{S}^2$ and $\mathbb{RP}^2$ are the only compact surfaces with finite number of covers.
- Is the monodromy action of the universal covering of a Riemann surface faithful?
- Left half of complex plane and graph of logarithm are diffeomorphic?
- regular covering proof
- The map $p : S^1 → S^1$ given by $p(z) = z^2$ is a covering map. Generalize to $p(z) = z^n$.
- If $H \le \pi_1(X,x)$ is conjugate to $P_*(\pi_1(Y, y))$, then $H \cong P_*(\pi_1(Y, y'))$ for some $y' \in P^{-1}(x)$
Related Questions in SHEAF-COHOMOLOGY
- Question about notation for Čech cohomology and direct image of sheaves in Hartshorne
- Image of a morphism of chain complexes of sheaves via direct/inverse image functor
- Does $H^2(X_{Zar},\mathcal{O}_X^\times)=0$ for $X$ a regular scheme?
- Computing the dimension of $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_X(D))$, where $D \subset X$ is a divisor
- Is the cohomology of a stalk the same as the stalk of the cohomology sheaf?
- If $H^i(\tilde{X}, \mathcal{F}) = 0$, then is it true that $H^i(X, \mathcal{F}) = 0$?
- Conditions on $\mathcal{F}$ such that $\chi(\mathcal{F}) = 0$ for a coherent sheaf on a curve over $k$.
- Cohomology and inverse image of divisors
- $\dim H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_D) \leq 1 + \deg D$ when $-1 \leq \deg D \leq g - 1$
- Bott vanishing from the Euler sequence
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I hope I didn't made a mistake, here is a try for a counter-example : let $X = D \times \Bbb N$ where $D$ is the unit disk. Write $D_n := D \times \{n\}$. $Y = D$ and $\pi$ is the projection.
Define a sheaf $F_n$ on each $D_n$ by $F_n(U) = \Bbb Z$ if $U \subset D(0,1/n)$ and $0$ else. Let $F = \prod_{n \geq 0} F_n$. Now, let $G = \prod_{n \geq 0} G_n$ where $G_n$ is the skyscraper sheaf at $0 \in D_n$ with stalk $\Bbb Z$. Clearly, we have a natural morphism $f : F \to G$ and such morphism is surjective.
On the other hand, if we look at the direct image we should have a surjection $(\pi_*F)_0 \to (\pi_*G)_0$ if our functor was exact. Let $s_0 \in (\pi_*G)_0$, if there is another germ $t_0 \in (\pi_*F)_0$ with $f_0(t_0) = s_0$ then this means by definition that we should have a small open $U$ with $t \in (\pi_*F)(U)$, $s \in (\pi_*G(U))$ and $f(t) = s$, and the stalk at $0$ of $t$ (resp. $s$) is $t_0$ (resp $s_0$.) Such open $U$ contains some ball of radius $\delta > 1/N > 0$ around zero. If we look at $0 \in D_N$, we have $F_N(\pi^{-1}(U)) = \{0\}$ by definition, but $G_N(\pi^{-1}(U)) = \Bbb Z$, in particular we don't have a surjection $(\pi_*F)_0 \to (\pi_*G)_0$. So this functor is not exact.