In Wikipedia Unitary Group, it says that $$1\to \operatorname {SU} (n)\to \operatorname {U} (n)\to \operatorname {U} (1)\to 1.$$
However, we see that [this I understand] $\operatorname {U} (n)$ is related to $\operatorname {SU} (n)$ and $\operatorname {U} (1)$ by $$ \operatorname {U} (n)=\frac{\operatorname {U} (1)\times \operatorname {SU} (n)}{\mathbb{Z}_n} $$ where ${\mathbb{Z}_n}= {\mathbb{Z}}/({n \mathbb{Z}})$, a finite Abelian cyclic group of order $n$. This is the case because both $U(1)$ and ${SU} (n)$ shares the same subgroup $${\mathbb{Z}_n}=\{ \exp(\frac{2 \pi i }{n}j) \cdot \mathbb{I}_{n\times n}\}$$ where $j \in \mathbb{Z} \mod n$.
If so, why is this true $$1\to \operatorname {SU} (n)\to \frac{\operatorname {U} (1)\times \operatorname {SU} (n)}{\mathbb{Z}_n} \to \operatorname {U} (1)\to 1?$$ Is ${SU} (n)$ a normal subgroup of ${U} (n)=\frac{\operatorname {U} (1)\times \operatorname {SU} (n)}{\mathbb{Z}_n}$, precisely?
The determinant mapping $A \mapsto |A|$ is a group homomorphism $U(n) \to U(1)$. Its kernel is $SU(n)$. So $SU(n)$ is a normal subgroup of $U(n)$.