Prove or disprove: If $R$ is the reduced row echelon form (RREF) of $A$, then $\det A = \det R$, where $A$ is an $n \times n$ matrix.
2026-03-26 21:10:23.1774559423
Is the determinant of a RREF matrix equal to the determinant of the original matrix?
16.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in DETERMINANT
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Let $T:V\to W$ on finite dimensional vector spaces, is it possible to use the determinant to determine that $T$ is invertible.
- Optimization over images of column-orthogonal matrices through rotations and reflections
- Effect of adding a zero row and column on the eigenvalues of a matrix
- Geometric intuition behind determinant properties
- Help with proof or counterexample: $A^3=0 \implies I_n+A$ is invertible
- Prove that every matrix $\in\mathbb{R}^{3\times3}$ with determinant equal 6 can be written as $AB$, when $|B|=1$ and $A$ is the given matrix.
- Properties of determinant exponent
- How to determine the characteristic polynomial of the $4\times4$ real matrix of ones?
- The determinant of the sum of a positive definite matrix with a symmetric singular matrix
Related Questions in GAUSSIAN-ELIMINATION
- When solving system's of equation what does t represent in this problem and when/why does it occur?
- What is the relation of between $REF(A)$ and $REF(A^T)$?
- Gauss-Jordan elimination to solve without employing pivoting
- Finding solution for a linear system(see below)
- Solving linear system after Gaussian elimination
- Left-looking Gaussian elimination
- inverse matrix with modulo
- inverse of a $2\times2$ matrix, Gaussian elimination with unknown $x$
- Gauss Jordan inverse matrix, row of all zeros
- Show that if A is strictly diagonal dominant, then a submatrix of A is also strictly diagonal dominant.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No you can't simply apply directly the properties that you use with matrices, as @zthomas.nc proved it wrong:
You can use determinants properties to get sort of "echelon-determinant".
1. Linearity of determinant
Given a $n \times n$ matrix $A$ we indicate its columns as $C_1, C_2, C_3, \dots, C_n$ or its rows as $R_1, R_2, R_3, \dots, R_n$.
Linearity says, for both columns and rows:
Note: A consequence of the homogeneity property is
\begin{equation*} \textrm{det}(\lambda A) = \lambda^n\textrm{det}(A). \end{equation*}
Note: If two columns or rows are proportional the determinant is zero
\begin{equation*} \textrm{det}(C_1, C_2, \dots, C_i, \dots, \lambda C_i, \dots, C_n) = \lambda\textrm{det}(C_1, C_2, \dots, C_i, \dots, C_i, \dots, C_n) = 0 \end{equation*}
2. Linear combination of rows or columns
The determinant of $A$ doesn't change if we sum to a column or row a linear combination of other columns or rows
\begin{equation*} \textrm{det}(C_1, C_2, \dots, C_i, \dots, C_j \dots, C_n) = \textrm{det}(C_1, C_2, \dots, C_i + \lambda C_j, \dots, C_j, \dots, C_n) = \textrm{det}(C_1, C_2, \dots, C_i, \dots, C_j, \dots, C_n) + \textrm{det}(C_1, C_2, \dots, \lambda C_j, \dots, C_j, \dots, C_n) = \textrm{det}(C_1, C_2, \dots, C_i, \dots, C_j, \dots, C_n) + 0. \end{equation*}
3. Echelon form
Given this two properties we can now find a sort of echelon form, in the sense that we can sum linear combination of rows and columns and use the linearity to have a simplified form of the determinant.
So the previous example A = $\begin{bmatrix} 17 & 0 \\ 0 & 17 \end{bmatrix}$ would be
\begin{equation*} \left\lvert \begin{matrix} 17 & 0 \\ 0 & 17 \\ \end{matrix} \right\rvert = 17^2 \left\lvert \begin{matrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{matrix} \right\rvert = 17^2 = 289. \end{equation*}