Is the following a field?

231 Views Asked by At

I think I may need a refresher in logs here. The question is:

F=$\{a \in R \vert a<1\} 1<t \in R$

(1)$a\#b= a+b-ab$ for all $a,b \in$ F

(2)$a*b=1-t^{log_t(1-a) * log_t(1-b)}$ for all $a,b \in F$ where # and * are just function notation.

Is this a field?

Well, starting with (1), I stated that a=1/2 and b=2/3, then

$1/2\#2/3= 1/2 + 2/3 - (1/2)(2/3)= 5/6$ which is less than 1

(2) then is $(1/2)*(2/3)=1-t^{log_t(1-a) log_t(1-b)}$

Here is where I'm lost on how to work the rest. I'm pretty sure its going to turn out to be less than 1 since we have 1-something bigger than 1. After, this I believe I then have to use the 6 conditions that determine a field. They are:

  1. associativity of addition and multiplication
  2. commutativity of addition and multiplication
  3. distributivity of multiplication over addition
  4. existence of identity elements for addition and multiplication
  5. existence of additive inverse
  6. existence of mulitiplicative inverse where a cannot be 0
1

There are 1 best solutions below

2
On BEST ANSWER

Consider the bijective mapping $$ \psi:F\to\mathbb{R},\psi(x)=\log_t(1-x) $$ with $\psi^{-1}(x)=1-t^x$. Then $$\eqalign{ a\#b&=\psi^{-1}(\psi(a)+\psi(b))\cr a*b&=\psi^{-1}(\psi(a)\cdot\psi(b))} $$ This proves that $\psi$ transfers the field structure of $(\mathbb{R},+,0)$ to $(F,\#,*)$. So, $(F,\#,*)$ is a field isomorphic to the field of real numbers.