Knowing that $$\int_0^\infty x^n\exp(-x)\,dx=n!,$$ can we prove the following inequality: $$\int_0^n x^n\exp(-x) \,dx< \frac{n!}2 \;\;?$$
2026-05-16 19:53:00.1778961180
Is the integral less than $\frac{n!}2?$
206 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in INTEGRATION
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- How to integrate $\int_{0}^{t}{\frac{\cos u}{\cosh^2 u}du}$?
- Show that $x\longmapsto \int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha }}dy$ is integrable.
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- multiplying the integrands in an inequality of integrals with same limits
- Closed form of integration
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Which type of Riemann Sum is the most accurate?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let's take a step back and think a bit more elementary.
Consider the graph of $f(x) = x^n \exp(-x)$. Flip it over the line $x=n$ to get $f(2n-x)$. It is enough to show that
$$\int_{n}^{2n} f(2n-x) \, dx < \int_{n}^{2n} f(x) \, dx \,.$$
I will now show that if $x \in (n, 2n)$, then $f(2n-x) < f(x)$, which is enough to prove the above. Rearranging,
$$ \begin{align} (2n-x)^n \exp(x-2n) &< x^n \exp(-x) \\ \left( \frac{2n-x}{x} \right) &< \exp(2(n-x)). \end{align} $$
Now, let's do a little shift to $x \in (0, n)$ by doing $x \mapsto x-n$. Then we need to prove that
$$\left(\frac{n-x}{n+x}\right)^n < \exp(-2x).$$
Take the logarithm of both sides(it is well-defined) to get
$$n(\ln(n-x) - \ln(n+x)) < -2x$$
To prove the above inequality, let $a(x) = n(\ln(n-x) - \ln(n+x))$. I will now show that $a'(x) < -2$ for $x \in (0,n)$ which is enough to prove the above. Computing the derivative gives
$$a'(x) = -2 \left(\frac{n^2}{n^2-x^2}\right) < -2 \left(\frac{n^2-x^2}{n^2-x^2}\right) = -2.$$