The Levi-Civita connection is defined by the Koszul formula to be independent of the metric. This applies to both Riemannian and pseudo-Riemannian metrics. In the latter, this is known as the miracle of semi-Riemannian geometry (p60 of Semi-Riemannian geometry with applications to relativity O'Neil). This seems to conclusively prove that the Levi-Civita connection is the same in both geometries. Certainly, the connection coefficients are also defined the same. Am I misunderstanding anything with that conclusion?
2026-03-25 18:59:11.1774465151
Is the Levi-Civita connection on a Lorentzian manifold the same as that on a Riemannian manifold?
305 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CONNECTIONS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Conectionless parallel transport
- Holonomy group and irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$-connections
- How is the covariant derivative of a metric, $\nabla g$, defined?
- Different definitions of irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ connections
- If $\nabla X=h \cdot \text{Id}_{TM}$ for a vector field $X$ and $h \in C^{\infty}(M)$, is $h$ constant?
- Connection on a vector bundle in terms of sections
- Passage in the proof of Chern-Weil method in John Roe's Elliptic operators book
Related Questions in SEMI-RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- Do pp-wave spacetimes have a well-defined signature/index?
- Can the Gram-Schmidt algorithm be extended to construct a basis for $T_p M$ of a semi-Riemannian manifold?
- Does a coordinate chart have a smooth orthonormal frame w.r.t. a semi-Riemannian metric?
- Is there a coordinate free proof for this result?
- Making sense of $2{\rm grad}(\langle H,H\rangle) + 4 {\rm trace}(A_{DH}) = 0$
- Points fixed by the isotropy group of the restricted Poincaré group in Minkowski space
- The equivalence of two definitions of Cauchy surfaces.
- How to solve a second ODE involving the Lorentzian function, possibly using analytical methods?
- Definition of a metric tensor in Barrett O'Neil's book
- Lorentz transformations in matrix form (Matrix Multiplication problem)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The "miracle" only means that given a semi-Riemannian metric $g$ on a manifold $M$ there exists a unique torsion-free affine connection $\nabla=\nabla_g$ which preserves $g$. The word unique here means that if $\nabla'$ is another torsion-free affine connection which preserves $g$, then $\nabla=\nabla'$. The uniqueness here does not mean that if $h$ is another semi-Riemannian metric on $M$ then $\nabla_g=\nabla_h$. In fact, it is very seldom that two Riemannian metrics share the same connection. It is also seldom the case that if $g, h$ are semi-Riemannian metrics of different signature then $\nabla_g=\nabla_h$.
Edit: If you want an explicit formula for the L-C connection (in terms of the Christoffel symbols), you have $$\Gamma^l_{jk} = \tfrac{1}{2} g^{lr} \left( \partial _k g_{rj} + \partial _j g_{rk} - \partial _r g_{jk} \right).$$ This is equivalent to the Koszul formula, but easier to parse. The semi-Riemannian metric enters this formula in the most obvious way.