Is the product IJ of ideals I, J of a ring A an ideal?

1.6k Views Asked by At

More specific, Let $A$ be the ring and $I, J$ ideals of $A$. Then $I\cdot J=$finite sums of elements of the form $u\cdot v$, with $u\in I; v\in J$ is an ideal. Also, I need to prove that $I\cdot J\subseteq I\cap J$.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

0
On

Yes it is an ideal. You should check that it is an abelian group. Furthermore, it should be easy to verify that it absorbs multiplication by any element $a \in A.$ As for the last point, note that every element is a finite sum of elements of the form $u \cdot v$ hence every summand of the element is an element of both $I$ and $J$ and hence an element of $I \cap J.$

3
On

If $I$ is a left ideal, and $J$ is a right ideal of $A$, then

$IJ = \left \{ \displaystyle \sum_1^n i_k j_k \mid n \in \Bbb N, i_k \in I, \; j_k \in J \right \} \tag 1$

is a two-sided ideal of $A$.

To prove this, we must establish two facts:

first, that if $a, b \in IJ$, then $a - b \in IJ$; for if $a, b \in IJ$ then we have

$a = \displaystyle \sum_1^{n_a} i_k j_k, \tag 2$

$b = \displaystyle \sum_1^{n_b} i_l j_l, \tag 3$

with $n_a, n_b \in \Bbb N$, $i_k, i_l \in I$, $j_k, j_l \in J$; but

$a - b = \displaystyle \sum_1^{n_a} i_k j_k - \sum_1^{n_b} i_l j_l \tag 4$

may clearly be written as a sum of the form

$\displaystyle \sum_1^n i_k j_k, \; n \in \Bbb N, \; i_k \in I, \; j_k \in J; \tag 5$

thus

$a - b \in IJ \tag 6$

as it is defined in (1);

second, that if $a \in IJ$, $r, s \in A$, both $ra, as \in IJ$; since $a \in IJ$ may be written

$a = \displaystyle \sum_1^n i_k j_k, \tag 7$

we have

$ra = \displaystyle \sum_1^n ri_k j_k; \tag 8$

but since $I$ is a left ideal, $ri_k \in I$ for all $i_k \in I$, $r \in A$; thus the sum

$\displaystyle \sum_1^n ri_k j_k \in IJ; \tag 9$

likewise, by a similar argument which exploits the fact that $j_ks \in J$ for $j_k \in J$, $s \in A$,

$as = \displaystyle \sum_1^n i_k j_k s \in IJ. \tag{10}$

We have shown that for $a, b \in IJ$, $r, s \in A$, that

$a - b, ra, as \in IJ, \tag{11}$

and thus $IJ$ satisfies the definition of a two-sided ideal of $A$.

As for

$IJ \subset I \cap J, \tag{12}$

this is easy to see if we allow $I$, $J$ to be two-sided ideals, since then

$ij \in I, \; ij \in J \Longrightarrow ij \in I \cap J. \tag{13}$