Is the product of two quaternions guaranteed to stay in the upper hemisphere if the two quaternions reside in the upper hemisphere?

59 Views Asked by At

My question is in the title. Let's say there are two quaternions $\mathbf q_1$ and $\mathbf q_2$, and both of them reside in the upper hemisphere of $\mathbb S^3$.

Is the result of their multiplication $\mathbf q_3 = \mathbf q_1 * \mathbf q_2$ also guaranteed to lie in the upper hemisphere or are there any corner cases when $\mathbf q_3$ will move to the lower hemisphere?

For example, are there any issues when the quaternions lie on the equator?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

6
On BEST ANSWER

No.

Consider scalars $a, b$ and imaginary quaternions $v, w$ (which we can think of as 3D vectors). Then $$ (a+v)(b+w) = [ab - v\cdot w] + [aw + bv + v\times w]. $$ These quaternions $a+v$ and $b+w$ are unit quaterions if $$ a^2 + |v|^2 = 1,\quad b^2 + |w|^2 = 1 $$ so because $a, b > 0$ we can write the scalar term of the product as $$ \sqrt{1-|v|^2}\sqrt{1-|w|^2} - v\cdot w. $$ We can choose any $|v|,|w| < 1$; choose $v = w$ to get $$ 1 - 2|v|^2. $$ Clearly if $|v| \geq 1/\sqrt2$ then our resultant quaterinion is outside the northern hemisphere.

To summarize, we've shown that for any $q$ in the northern hemisphere with scalar part $\geq1/\sqrt2$, it's square $q^2$ is outside the northern hemisphere.


From a higher level perspective, the group of unit quaternions $\mathbb S^3$ naturally gives us a double cover of $\mathrm{SO}(3)$, explicitly $$ \rho : \mathbb S^3 \to \mathrm{SO}(3),\quad \rho_q(v) = qv\bar q $$ where $v \in \mathbb R^3$ is thought of as an imaginary quaternion and $\bar q = q^{-1}$ is the conjugate. We have $\ker\rho = \{\pm1\}$, meaning that both $q$ and $-q$ represent the same rotation. If the upper hemisphere $\mathbb S^3_+$ were closed under under multiplication then it would be a subgroup of $\mathbb S^3$ which is isomorphic to the "subgroup" $$ \mathrm{SO}(3)\setminus\{180^\circ\text{ rotations}\} $$ but the set of all $180^\circ$ rotations is not a subgroup. Equivalently, the equator of $\mathbb S^3$ is not a subgroup: if $v,w$ are imaginary then $$ vw = -v\cdot w + v\times w $$ which need not be imaginary.