Imagine you have a system of equations of the form: $$ \mathbf {\dot{x}} = A \mathbf{x} $$ And $A$ cannot be diagonalized, so you find it's Jordan form: $$ A = P J P^{-1} \\ \; \\ J = \begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & 1 & 0 & \dots & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_2 & 1 & \dots & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \lambda_3 & \dots & 0 \\ \vdots &\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & 0& \dots & \lambda_n \\ \end{pmatrix} $$ The solution of the differential equation is: $$ \mathbf{x}(t) = e^{At}\mathbf{x_0} $$ My question is: If the matrix $A$ was diagonalizable, then: $$ e^{At} = P \begin{pmatrix} e^{\lambda_1t} & 0 & 0 & \dots & 0 \\ 0 & e^{\lambda_2 t} & 0 & \dots & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & e^{\lambda_3 t} & \dots & 0 \\ \vdots &\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & 0& \dots & e^{\lambda_n t} \\ \end{pmatrix} P^{-1} $$ because: $$ e^{At} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(At)^n}{n!} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(PDP^{-1})^n}{n!}t^n = P \left ( \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{D^n}{n!}t^n \right )P^{-1} = P e^{Dt} P^{-1} $$ but, is this last relation: $$ \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(PJP^{-1})^n}{n!}t^n = P \left ( \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{J^n}{n!}t^n \right )P^{-1} = P e^{Jt} P^{-1} $$ still apply for a Jordan form? I know that when you sum all the terms involved in $e^{Jt}$, polynomials of $t$ will appear apart from the exponential related to the eigenvalue: $e^{\lambda_k t}$. But, is this still valid?
2026-04-13 14:03:16.1776088996
Is the relation $e^{At} = Pe^{Jt} P^{-1}$ valid for a Jordan form?
95 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in ORDINARY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Stability of system of ordinary nonlinear differential equations
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Power series solution of $y''+e^xy' - y=0$
- Change of variables in a differential equation
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Solve the initial value problem $x^2y'+y(x-y)=0$
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
Related Questions in DYNAMICAL-SYSTEMS
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Stability of stationary point $O(0,0)$ when eigenvalues are zero
- Determine $ \ a_{\max} \ $ and $ \ a_{\min} \ $ so that the above difference equation is well-defined.
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- How to analyze a dynamical system when $t\to\infty?$
- The system $x' = h(y), \space y' = ay + g(x)$ has no periodic solutions
- Existence of unique limit cycle for $r'=r(μ-r^2), \space θ' = ρ(r^2)$
- Including a time delay term for a differential equation
- Doubts in proof of topologically transitive + dense periodic points = Devaney Chaotic
- Condition for symmetric part of $A$ for $\|x(t)\|$ monotonically decreasing ($\dot{x} = Ax(t)$)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes, although there is a bit of checking you need to do first. First, your Jordan form is slightly wrong. $J$ should be a block diagonal matrix
$$ J = \begin{bmatrix} J_1 & \; & \; \\ \; & \ddots & \; \\ \; & \; & J_p\end{bmatrix} $$
where each block $J_i$ is given by
$$ J_i = \begin{bmatrix} \lambda_i & 1 & \; & \; \\ \; & \lambda_i & \ddots & \; \\ \; & \; & \ddots & 1 \\ \; & \; & \; & \lambda_i \end{bmatrix}. $$ In particular, we only have ones above the diagonals within blocks corresponding to a single eigenvalue each. The matrix exponential of this block diagonal matrix is given by
$$ e^{tJ} = \begin{bmatrix} e^{tJ_1} & \; & \; \\ \; & \ddots & \; \\ \; & \; & e^{tJ_p}\end{bmatrix}. $$ Now we just have to compute the matrix exponential of a single Jordan block.
We decompose the Jordan block $J_i$ into diagonal and off-diagonal terms, $J_i = D_i + N_i$, where $D_i = \lambda_i I$ and
$$ N_i = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 & \; & \; \\ \; & 0 & \ddots & \; \\ \; & \; & \ddots & 1 \\ \; & \; & \; & 0 \end{bmatrix}. $$ These matrices commute, so we can use the fact that $e^{A+B} = e^Ae^B$ for commuting matrices $A$ and $B$. Notice that the Jordan form you wrote does not satisfy this property since it is essential that the diagonal terms are the same for them to commute. Also notice that $N_i$ is nilpotent, so $N_i^k = 0_{k\times k}$, where $k$ is the size of the Jordan block. We can now calculate the matrix exponential.
$$ \begin{aligned} e^{tJ_i} &= e^{tD_i + tN_i} = e^{tD_i}e^{tN_i}\\ &= e^{\lambda_i t}I_{k\times k} \cdot \left(\sum_{j=0}^k \frac{t^jN_i^j} {j!}\right) \\ &= e^{\lambda_i t}\left(\sum_{j=0}^k \frac{t^jN_i^j} {j!}\right), \end{aligned} $$ which is a vector of polynomials in $t$ times $e^{\lambda_i t}$, which is what we would expect. One can then apply the $P$ and $P^{-1}$ from both sides to obtain the final result.