Is the right annihilator of an element in a ring a subring?

1.4k Views Asked by At

let $R$ be a ring and let $x$ not equal to $0$ be a fixed element in R. Then is $\{r \mid xr=0\}$ a subring of $R$?

The solution says yes, but I don't think so, because the multiplicative identity is not always included.(e.g. R = Z4, and x = 2) Any ideas?

2

There are 2 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

You can show that:

  • Your set is always a right ideal of $R$. Moreover, you could consider it a rng contained in $R$ since it's closed under multiplication (and is an abelian subgroup of $(R,+)$.)
  • There's no guarantee it will be a ring with identity. But it can happen: if $x$ commutes with elements of $R$ and $x^2=x$, then the set you gave is a ring with identity $1-x$.
  • It cannot be a subring that shares the identity with $R$. That would imply that the identity $1$ of $R$ is in the set, so that $x=x1=0$, but by assumption $0\neq x$.
0
On

For $0 \ne x \in R$, setting

$S(x) = \{r \in R \mid xr = 0\}, \tag{1}$

then it is easy to see that i.) $0 \in S(x)$, since $x0 = 0$; ii.) $r, s \in S(x) \Rightarrow r + s \in S(x)$, since $xr = xs = 0 \Rightarrow x(r + s) = xr + xs = 0$; iii.) $r \in S(x) \Rightarrow -r \in S(x)$, since $x(-r) = -rx = 0$; iv.) $r, s \in S(x) \Rightarrow rs, sr \in S(x)$, since $xr = xs = 0 \Rightarrow x(rs) = (xr)s = 0s = 0$ and $x(sr) = (xs)r = 0r = 0$. Thus $S(x)$ is closed under the operations of $R$ and contains $0 \in R$, the additive identity. It thus follows that $S(x)$ satisfies all of the ring axioms with respect to the operations of $R$. But if the one's accepted definition of "ring" includes necessarily the existence of a multiplicative unit, then $S(x)$ is not a subring of $R$, since $1_R x = x 1_R = x \ne 0$, so $1_R \notin S(x)$. In my experience, most authors would not insist the definition of "ring" include a multiplicative identity, reserving a term such as "unital ring" for those that do have a $1_R \in R$. So I would say that, under the usual, conventional definition of a ring, $S(x)$ is indeed a subring of $R$.

Hope this helps. Cheers,

and as always,

Fiat Lux!!!