Fix $M>0$. Let $\Phi = \{f|f:[a, b] \to [-M, M] \, \text{is an non-decreasing function} \}$. Define a metric $d: \Phi \times \Phi \to [0, \infty)$ by $(,)=(\int_{a}^b |(x)−(x)|^2 dx)^{1/2}$. Is the topology induced by compact?
2026-04-06 15:43:57.1775490237
Is the set of uniformly bounded non-decreasing functions a compact set with the 2 metric?
76 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in COMPACTNESS
- Every nonempty perfect set in $\mathbb R^k$ is uncountable: Rudin's argument
- Help in understanding proof of Heine-Borel Theorem from Simmons
- Is the distance between those compact sets equal to $0$?
- Are compact groups acting on Polish spaces essentially Polish?
- Set of Positive Sequences that Sum to 1 is Compact under Product Topology?
- The space $D(A^\infty)$
- Proving the one-point compactification of a topological space is a topology
- Never Used Compact Closure...
- Continuity of the maximal element of a multi-valued function
- Consider the metric space of infinite sequences of 0s and 1s under this metric.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The answer is yes.
Let $(f_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ be some sequence in $\Phi$ and let $(q_k)_{k\in \mathbb{N}}$ be some enumeration of $[a,b]\cap \mathbb{Q}$. By compactness of $[-M,M]$, we can extract a subsequence $(f_{n,1})_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ such that $f_{n,1}(q_1)$ converges.
Inductively, let $(f_{n,k+1})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ be a subsequence of $(f_{n,k})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ such that $f_{n,k+1}(q_{k+1})$ converges. Combining all of these, we get that for every $k$, the tail $(f_{n,n})_{n\geq k}$ is a subsequence of $(f_{n,k})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ and therefore, $f_{n,n}(q_k)$ converges for every $k$ to some non-decreasing limit function $f:[a,b]\cap \mathbb{Q}\to \mathbb{R}$
Setting $f(x)=\sup_{q\in [a,x]\cap \mathbb{Q}} f(q)$ extends $f$ to a non-decreasing function on all of $(a,b]$ which, in particular, can only be discontinuous at countably many points. We claim that for every point $x$ of continuity of $f$, we must have $f_{n,n}(x)\to f(x)$.
Indeed, let $\varepsilon>0$ and note that by continuity at $x$, there exists some $\delta$ such that $|f(y)-f(x)|\leq \varepsilon/2$ for all $y\in [x-\delta, x+\delta]$ pick furthermore $n$ large enough that $|f_{n,n}(x)-f(q_-)|<\varepsilon/2$ and $|f_{n,n}(q_+)-f(x)|<\varepsilon/2$ for some choice of $q_-\in [x-\delta,x)\cap \mathbb{Q}$, $q_+\in (x,x+\delta]\cap \mathbb{Q}$ and $n$ large enough. Then, we get, again for $n$ large enough, since $f_{n,n}$ is non-decreasing, that $$ f(x)-\varepsilon \leq f(q_-)-\varepsilon \leq f_{n,n}(q_-)/2\leq f_{n,n}(x) \leq f_{n,n}(q_+)\leq f(q_+)+\varepsilon/2\leq f(x)+\varepsilon, $$ so that $|f(x)-f_{n,n}(x)|\leq \varepsilon$. We conclude that $f_{n,n}\to f$ almost everywhere.
Thus, we can apply dominated convergence since $|f_{n,n}|^2\leq M^2\in L^1([a,b])$ for all $n$ and get that
$$ \int_a^b |f_{n,n}|^2\textrm{d}x\to \int_a^b |f|^2\textrm{d}x, $$ which proves that $f_{n,n}$ converges to $f$ under $d$. Thus, $(\Phi,d)$ is compact.