Let $A=\left\{ p_{r},p_{r+1},\dots\right\}$ a (infinte) set of consecutive prime numbers (if you prefer, if $\mathfrak{P}$ is the set of all prime numbers, $A=\mathfrak{P}-\left\{ 2,\dots,p_{r-1}\right\}$).
I want to show that doesn't exists a natural number $n$ such that $$n\equiv1\textrm{ mod }p_{i},\,\forall i=r,r+1,\dots$$
I think it's true but I'm note sure. Am I wrong?
If you allow $n=1$ your claim is false.
If $n>1$ is imposed, just note that there will be a prime $p_i$ in your list greater than $n$ and $n$ is certainly not $1$ modulo this prime.