is there a polynomial with real coefficients $P$ such that $nP(n) = \varphi(n)$ for all $n \ge 1$?
is there a non-constant polynomial with integer coefficients $P$ such that $P(n)\varphi(n)$ is a square number for all $n \ge 1$?
where $\varphi(n)$ is the number of natural numbers less than or equal to $n$ that is relative prime to $n$.
Attempt:
For no. 1.), let us see if $n$ is prime, let say $n=x$ is prime, then always $\varphi(x) = x-1$. So if $nP(n) = \varphi(n)$ then $$ P(x) = \frac{x-1}{x} $$
Now notice that $0 < \frac{x-1}{x} < 1$. But since any polynomial has limit $\pm \infty$ as $x \rightarrow \infty$, and prime number is unbounded above, so there must exist a large enough prime for any polynomial such that $P(x)>1$. So the answer is there is no such polynomial.
For no. 2), I have difficulties..
For question 2., let's assume such a polynomial
$$P(x)=p_mx^m+\ldots+p_1x+p_0$$
exists, and that it has among all such polynomials the minimal degree $m$.
There are 2 cases, regarding the constant term $p_0$:
Case 1: $p_0 \neq 0$
Then there is a prime number $q_1$ with $q_1 \nmid p_0$, from which follows that $q_1 \nmid P(q_1^k)$ for any $k \ge 1$. So we have
$$P(q_1^2)\varphi(q_1^2) = P(q_1^2)q_1(q_1-1)$$
and the right hand side contains the prime $q_1$ in exactly the 1st power. So it cannot be a square!
Case 2: $p_0=0$
We have $P(x)=xR(x)$ with
$$R(x)=r_{m-1}x^{m-1}+\ldots+r_1x+r_0$$
again being a polynomial with integer coefficients. Again we need to consider 2 cases:
Case 2.1: $r_0 \neq 0$
Again we find a prime $q_2 \nmid r_0 \Longrightarrow q_2 \nmid R(q_2)$ and get
$$P(q_2)\varphi(q_2)=q_2R(q_2)(q_2-1)$$
with the right hand side containg $q_2$ in the 1st power, so not a square.
Case 2.2: $r_0 = 0$
Again we get $P(x)=x^2S(x)$, with $R(x)=xS(x)$, with $S(x)$ having integer coefficients.
So for any $n \ge 1$ we have
$$ \mathbb Z \ni S(n)\varphi(n) = \frac{P(n)}{n^2}\varphi(n) = \frac{P(n)\varphi(n)}{n^2}$$
and the rightmost term is the square of rational number, so a square of an integer as it is itself an integer.
So $S(x)$ is also a polynomial that has the properies required of problem 2. But since $P(x)$ is non-constant, $S(x)$ has a smaller degree than $P(x)$, which contradicts the choice of $P(x)$.
That proves that such a polynomial cannot exist at all.