A similar question was asked for the case where all $a_i$ are real here: Is there an infinite sequence of real numbers $a_1, a_2, a_3,... $ such that ${a_1}^m+{a_2}^m+a_3^m+...=m$ for every positive integer $m$?
Is there an infinite sequence of complex numbers $a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots$ such that $a_1^m + a_2^m + a_3^m + \ldots = m$ for every positive integer m?
135 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 2 best solutions below
On
Assume that $(a_k)$ is a sequence of complex numbers such that
$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} a_k^m$ converges for each $m$, and
there exists $m_0 \geq 1$ such that $\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} |a_k|^{m_0} < \infty$.
Then it is impossible to have $\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} a_k^m = m$ for all $m \geq 1$ (or even for all sufficiently large $m$). To this end, we assume otherwise and show that this leads to a contradiction.
Let $R = (\sup_{k\geq 1} |a_k|)^{-1} $. Then for any $|z| < R$,
$$ \frac{z}{(1-z)^2} - \Biggl( \sum_{m=1}^{m_0 - 1} m z^m \Biggr) = \sum_{m=m_0}^{\infty} m z^m = \sum_{m=m_0}^{\infty} \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} a_k^m z^m = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(a_k z)^{m_0}}{1 - a_k z}. $$
In the second step, we utilized the Fubini's theorem. The right-hand side converges locally uniformly on any compact subset of $\mathbb{C} \setminus A$ with $A = \{a_k^{-1} : k \geq 1 \text{ and } a_k \neq 0 \}$. Then for any bounded, simply connected region $\mathcal{D}$ such that $1 \in \mathcal{D}$ and $\partial\mathcal{D}$ avoids $A$,
\begin{align*} 1 = \frac{i}{2\pi} \int_{\partial\mathcal{D}} \Biggl( \sum_{m=m_0}^{\infty} m z^m \Biggr) \, \mathrm{d}z = \frac{i}{2\pi} \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \int_{\partial\mathcal{D}} \frac{(a_k z)^{m_0}}{1 - a_k z} \, \mathrm{d}z = \sum_{k \, : \, a_k^{-1} \in \mathcal{D}} \frac{1}{a_k}. \end{align*}
Since $A$ is discrete, this implies that $A \subseteq \{1\}$ and there is exactly one non-zero element in $(a_k)$, which takes value $1$. Then it is obvious that such sequence cannot satisfy $\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} a_k^m = m$ for large $m$. $\square$
Without absolute convergence condition, I even have no idea whether the statement is true or not.
This was problem $B$-$1$ on the Putnam exam in $2010$. You can find the detailed solution here. In essence, the answer is that there is no such sequence of $a_i$ exists if we assme that the series $\sum a_i^m$ converges absolutely, and the solution manual provides a proof. It also provides a construction of a particular series of $a_n$ which satisfy the conditions, despite $\sum a_i^m$ not being absolutely convergent.